Yardi Voyager Property Management

A web-based multi-module management system designed by Yardi Systems for real estate & property management and professional services companies.

Yardi Voyager Property Management: Dashboard

Product Overview

  • Can easily handle large portfolios
  • Large amount of features and add-ons
  • Unique versions for subindustries
  • Large number of custom reports
  • Custom reporting issues
  • Lengthy front-end setup required
  • Not a large volume of written documentation to rely on

Target Market

About yardi voyager property management.

Yardi Voyager is a web-based property management software designed for large residential and commercial real estate portfolios. It integrates various aspects of property management, such as operations, leasing, analytics, and services for residents, tenants, and investors. The software caters to different property types including multifamily units, public housing authorities (PHAs), shopping malls, and airports.

There are two main versions of Yardi Voyager:

  • Voyager Residential: This version focuses on managing multifamily and apartment complexes, offering features like marketing, screening, insurance, revenue management, and business intelligence.
  • Voyager Commercial: This version is tailored for commercial buildings, encompassing operations, finance, leasing, and maintenance. It includes functionalities for marketing, customer relationship management (CRM), budgeting, construction, facilities management, and energy management.

Video Overview

Residential solutions, commercial solutions, yardi voyager key features.

  • Voyager Residential: Manages multifamily rentals and can be enhanced with RENT CafeSuite and Yardi Multifamily Suite for additional capabilities.
  • Voyager Affordable Housing: Adds functionality for affordable housing management, ensuring compliance with various regulations and subsidies.
  • Voyager PHA: Supports public housing authority operations, including property management and compliance.
  • Voyager Senior Housing: Focuses on senior living operations, integrating aspects like sales, health records, and resident engagement.
  • Voyager Condo, Co-op, and HOA: Provides condo management solutions with tools for maintenance, communication, and financial management.
  • Voyager for Military Housing: Automates military housing management for various housing types and complies with military reporting requirements.
  • Voyager Social Housing: Offers features for managing social housing, including rent calculation, subsidy tracking, and case management.
  • Voyager for Student Housing: Tailored for student housing management, accommodating unique leasing periods and high turnover.
  • Voyager Commercial: A comprehensive solution for managing commercial property lifecycles, integrating front office, back office, and external user needs.
  • Voyager for Airports: Specialized for airport management, handling leases, concessions, and facility maintenance.
  • Voyager for Government: Manages real estate processes for government agencies with integrated database and analytics tools.
  • Voyager for Ports: Manages port operations including leases, facilities, and contract management.
  • Voyager for Parks and Recreation: Maximizes lease income from various recreational facilities, automating management processes.
  • Yardi Voyager offers a range of features depending on the chosen solution, including:
  • Affordable Housing: Integrates compliance, property management, and accounting for affordable housing projects.
  • Asset Management: Provides financial rollups and performance reporting for various investment entities.
  • Budgeting and Forecasting: Facilitates accurate budget projections and integrates with property management.
  • Conductor: Automates report organization and distribution, offering multiple delivery options.
  • Construction: A comprehensive job-costing system for various construction projects.
  • Electronic Payment: Simplifies rent payment processing and record updates.
  • Maintenance: Manages maintenance tasks and expenditures across properties.
  • Minnesota Certificate of Rent Paid: Automates CRP process for Minnesota renters.
  • New York City Feature-Set: Addresses unique billing and calculation requirements for New York City properties.
  • Ontario Add-In: Tracks and reports data as per the Ontario Tenant Protection Act.
  • Public Housing: Tailored for Public Housing Agencies, streamlining subsidized housing program management.
  • Senior Housing: Manages financial and operational aspects of senior housing communities.
  • Spreadsheet Link: Links Yardi data with Microsoft Excel for customized financial reporting.
  • Developer Yardi Systems, Inc.
  • Type Property Management Software
  • Client OS Web
  • Deployment Cloud Hosted

Related Products

yardi voyager document management

User Reviews of Yardi Voyager Property Management

yardi voyager document management

We stayed with Yardi. They could import all our files and history within the upgraded system. This way there was no data entry or setting up of files. And we would not have to keep two systems in place to look up past transactions/history.

Ability to import from our older Yardi program

yardi voyager document management

My main complaint is support. After calling for information on how to accomplish a task through Yardi I am sent to “Sale” which really was an operator who had no clue where to send me for what I was asking which was no more than how to an email blast. I then get transferred to someone who had no clue how to walk me through it. Are you SERIOUS!? Does no one know/understand this product?

Haven’t used it long enough to mention.

Customer Support so far.

Have been using and supporting Yardi for mid-sized management companies. While Yardi offers a complete suite of functionality, their support is absolutely dismal, especially if you need any customization. After more than 15 years on the Yardi platform, we are moving on.

Web platform allows flexibility in user locations.

Customer support is terrible, web interface is outdated with a Web 1.0 look and feel.

We’re a German based investor and real estate manage and manage on behalf of pension funds and private equity.

We manage 1.4 billion of real estate in Germany, with a majority in the retail sector and the rest in office.

It’s been clear to us that the digitalization of real estate is something moving and we want to be at the forefront of that.

We needed a technology solution that was relevant to the local market but also had the ability to report multi-jurisdictional and across international borders. We found that Yardi with it’s international reputation and high level of adaptation to the local market and it’s level of interface with our business was the right answer.

Recently we were awarded a large mandate because we use Yardi. We look forward to Yardi becoming the market leader in the German marketspace and look forward to our partnership and ensuring we can both succeed in our fields.

We just found out that Yardi will be sunsetted in 2020 and were told to migrate would increase our cost from $30,000 annually to $150,000 annually

Property management is heavily reliant on operational functions and that is the reason we use Yardi to support our operations.

At the start Yardi understood our operational process and made customization and configurations to support us and gave us more control over the entire process so we did not miss out on anything and also helped us become more efficient.

Our staff are now just using one system to get things done without having to use multiple systems or do something offline which can lead to errors. And if you have a happy customer you have a happy staff, and with a happy staff comes a happy customer.

I would recommend anyone looking for a 360 solution in property management to use Yardi.

The best thing I find it does is allow for drill down on expenses so everyone from the property level on up can see what was spent and many times why. A huge problem is that most of their reports they have built into their system do NOT work and give faulty information. The on site rent roll product far inferior to its competitor One Site. Then they charge you ridiculous fees to customize the reports. The most painful and exasperating experience I’ve had in my 30+ years of property management.

the above mentioned drill down feature.

the above mentioned inadequately built program and what’s worse, no one at yardi seems to know much about the programs/reports or why they don’t work.

We’re a private equity real estate investment firm.

Our aggressive expansion goal is to double our size in the next 3-4 years.

We’re always on the lookout for the best deal at the best price so we can add value to the asset and deliver to our investors a great return.

The level of detail in the Yardi matrix data is exception. I have all the evaluations and sales history information on a property right at my fingertips.

I like the fact that Yardi is a company made by real estate researchers and real estate data providers and that there is a nerdy component to Yardi. I want my company to give better data and more robust data rather than a data sheet that isn’t relevant to what I’m looking for.

yardi voyager document management

eLearning allowed us to take our training to the next level and provide us with a scalable training strategy to take us to the next 10,000 units. Prior to this, agents would have to commute quite a ways for training purposes.

eLearning is a great vehicle for independent learning because it lets the student work at their pace with a guided approach. We decide the order they take their courses and let them unlock courses as they complete others.

I like how easy it is to use the eLearning tool. We are able to customize a lot and let our onsite teams do application processing, process payable and receivables and marketing, all within our own policies.

Life before Yardi was disparate in the sense of having different systems for different uses. We have input of data and information and there was always the chance of human error.

With Yardi you only input once into one system, and there’s processes in place to make sure it’s done properly.

All the information that we collect before we buy anything is demographic led and research led so when we do purchase a unit, our decisions our informed.

  • Product Info
  • User Reviews

Business Wire

Release Summary

  • Integrations
  • Learning Center

MoSCoW Prioritization

What is moscow prioritization.

MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. 

  The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the “W” in MoSCoW to mean “wish.”

What is the History of the MoSCoW Method?

Software development expert Dai Clegg created the MoSCoW method while working at Oracle. He designed the framework to help his team prioritize tasks during development work on product releases.

You can find a detailed account of using MoSCoW prioritization in the Dynamic System Development Method (DSDM) handbook . But because MoSCoW can prioritize tasks within any time-boxed project, teams have adapted the method for a broad range of uses.

How Does MoSCoW Prioritization Work?

Before running a MoSCoW analysis, a few things need to happen. First, key stakeholders and the product team need to get aligned on objectives and prioritization factors. Then, all participants must agree on which initiatives to prioritize.

At this point, your team should also discuss how they will settle any disagreements in prioritization. If you can establish how to resolve disputes before they come up, you can help prevent those disagreements from holding up progress.

Finally, you’ll also want to reach a consensus on what percentage of resources you’d like to allocate to each category.

With the groundwork complete, you may begin determining which category is most appropriate for each initiative. But, first, let’s further break down each category in the MoSCoW method.

Start prioritizing your roadmap

Moscow prioritization categories.

Moscow

1. Must-have initiatives

As the name suggests, this category consists of initiatives that are “musts” for your team. They represent non-negotiable needs for the project, product, or release in question. For example, if you’re releasing a healthcare application, a must-have initiative may be security functionalities that help maintain compliance.

The “must-have” category requires the team to complete a mandatory task. If you’re unsure about whether something belongs in this category, ask yourself the following.

moscow-initiatives

If the product won’t work without an initiative, or the release becomes useless without it, the initiative is most likely a “must-have.”

2. Should-have initiatives

Should-have initiatives are just a step below must-haves. They are essential to the product, project, or release, but they are not vital. If left out, the product or project still functions. However, the initiatives may add significant value.

“Should-have” initiatives are different from “must-have” initiatives in that they can get scheduled for a future release without impacting the current one. For example, performance improvements, minor bug fixes, or new functionality may be “should-have” initiatives. Without them, the product still works.

3. Could-have initiatives

Another way of describing “could-have” initiatives is nice-to-haves. “Could-have” initiatives are not necessary to the core function of the product. However, compared with “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if left out.

So, initiatives placed in the “could-have” category are often the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category ends up larger than expected.

4. Will not have (this time)

One benefit of the MoSCoW method is that it places several initiatives in the “will-not-have” category. The category can manage expectations about what the team will not include in a specific release (or another timeframe you’re prioritizing).

Placing initiatives in the “will-not-have” category is one way to help prevent scope creep . If initiatives are in this category, the team knows they are not a priority for this specific time frame. 

Some initiatives in the “will-not-have” group will be prioritized in the future, while others are not likely to happen. Some teams decide to differentiate between those by creating a subcategory within this group.

How Can Development Teams Use MoSCoW?

  Although Dai Clegg developed the approach to help prioritize tasks around his team’s limited time, the MoSCoW method also works when a development team faces limitations other than time. For example: 

Prioritize based on budgetary constraints.

What if a development team’s limiting factor is not a deadline but a tight budget imposed by the company? Working with the product managers, the team can use MoSCoW first to decide on the initiatives that represent must-haves and the should-haves. Then, using the development department’s budget as the guide, the team can figure out which items they can complete. 

Prioritize based on the team’s skillsets.

A cross-functional product team might also find itself constrained by the experience and expertise of its developers. If the product roadmap calls for functionality the team does not have the skills to build, this limiting factor will play into scoring those items in their MoSCoW analysis.

Prioritize based on competing needs at the company.

Cross-functional teams can also find themselves constrained by other company priorities. The team wants to make progress on a new product release, but the executive staff has created tight deadlines for further releases in the same timeframe. In this case, the team can use MoSCoW to determine which aspects of their desired release represent must-haves and temporarily backlog everything else.

What Are the Drawbacks of MoSCoW Prioritization?

  Although many product and development teams have prioritized MoSCoW, the approach has potential pitfalls. Here are a few examples.

1. An inconsistent scoring process can lead to tasks placed in the wrong categories.

  One common criticism against MoSCoW is that it does not include an objective methodology for ranking initiatives against each other. Your team will need to bring this methodology to your analysis. The MoSCoW approach works only to ensure that your team applies a consistent scoring system for all initiatives.

Pro tip: One proven method is weighted scoring, where your team measures each initiative on your backlog against a standard set of cost and benefit criteria. You can use the weighted scoring approach in ProductPlan’s roadmap app .

2. Not including all relevant stakeholders can lead to items placed in the wrong categories.

To know which of your team’s initiatives represent must-haves for your product and which are merely should-haves, you will need as much context as possible.

For example, you might need someone from your sales team to let you know how important (or unimportant) prospective buyers view a proposed new feature.

One pitfall of the MoSCoW method is that you could make poor decisions about where to slot each initiative unless your team receives input from all relevant stakeholders. 

3. Team bias for (or against) initiatives can undermine MoSCoW’s effectiveness.

Because MoSCoW does not include an objective scoring method, your team members can fall victim to their own opinions about certain initiatives. 

One risk of using MoSCoW prioritization is that a team can mistakenly think MoSCoW itself represents an objective way of measuring the items on their list. They discuss an initiative, agree that it is a “should have,” and move on to the next.

But your team will also need an objective and consistent framework for ranking all initiatives. That is the only way to minimize your team’s biases in favor of items or against them.

When Do You Use the MoSCoW Method for Prioritization?

MoSCoW prioritization is effective for teams that want to include representatives from the whole organization in their process. You can capture a broader perspective by involving participants from various functional departments.

Another reason you may want to use MoSCoW prioritization is it allows your team to determine how much effort goes into each category. Therefore, you can ensure you’re delivering a good variety of initiatives in each release.

What Are Best Practices for Using MoSCoW Prioritization?

If you’re considering giving MoSCoW prioritization a try, here are a few steps to keep in mind. Incorporating these into your process will help your team gain more value from the MoSCoW method.

1. Choose an objective ranking or scoring system.

Remember, MoSCoW helps your team group items into the appropriate buckets—from must-have items down to your longer-term wish list. But MoSCoW itself doesn’t help you determine which item belongs in which category.

You will need a separate ranking methodology. You can choose from many, such as:

  • Weighted scoring
  • Value vs. complexity
  • Buy-a-feature
  • Opportunity scoring

For help finding the best scoring methodology for your team, check out ProductPlan’s article: 7 strategies to choose the best features for your product .

2. Seek input from all key stakeholders.

To make sure you’re placing each initiative into the right bucket—must-have, should-have, could-have, or won’t-have—your team needs context. 

At the beginning of your MoSCoW method, your team should consider which stakeholders can provide valuable context and insights. Sales? Customer success? The executive staff? Product managers in another area of your business? Include them in your initiative scoring process if you think they can help you see opportunities or threats your team might miss. 

3. Share your MoSCoW process across your organization.

MoSCoW gives your team a tangible way to show your organization prioritizing initiatives for your products or projects. 

The method can help you build company-wide consensus for your work, or at least help you show stakeholders why you made the decisions you did.

Communicating your team’s prioritization strategy also helps you set expectations across the business. When they see your methodology for choosing one initiative over another, stakeholders in other departments will understand that your team has thought through and weighed all decisions you’ve made. 

If any stakeholders have an issue with one of your decisions, they will understand that they can’t simply complain—they’ll need to present you with evidence to alter your course of action.  

Related Terms

2×2 prioritization matrix / Eisenhower matrix / DACI decision-making framework / ICE scoring model / RICE scoring model

Prioritizing your roadmap using our guide

Try productplan free for 14 days, share on mastodon.

yardi voyager document management

Russia mistakenly doxed its own spies and secret bases by uploading their addresses on a public city hall website: investigative outlet

  • Russia accidentally exposed the locations of its secret bases and spy homes, per the Dossier Center.
  • It included them in a long list of buildings that are supposed to always have power, per the outlet.
  • The 434-page list was temporarily uploaded to the Moscow's city hall website, the outlet reported.

Insider Today

Moscow's city hall accidentally leaked the addresses of government safehouses, undercover facilities, and the homes of state operatives, the Dossier Center reported on Monday.

A 434-page list containing the addresses was uploaded on the city hall website. It appeared to be a guide for local electricity suppliers, wrote the investigative outlet, which was founded by the Russian opposition politician and activist Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

The document, titled "Special Group," earmarked specific buildings that authorities wanted to stay connected to in the event of blackouts or power shortages, reported the Dossier Center.

When Insider checked the Moscow city hall website on Monday, the document was no longer available online .

Several officials signed the document, including Moscow's mayor, Sergey Sobyanin, the Dossier Center reported.

While most of the list covered the addresses of public institutions like metro stations, police headquarters, and hospitals, it also pinpointed secret locations like an ammunition depot in Leningrad and undercover facilities run by the Federal Protective Service, according to the Dossier Center.

In one case, the document even included the apartment numbers of two homes used by spies in Moscow, the Dossier Center reported.

A list of residential addresses also revealed at least six apartment buildings in Moscow that contain homes sold or given to intelligence officers in the Foreign Intelligence Service, Russia's top external intelligence agency, per the outlet.

About 10 other entries in the document listed buildings in Moscow used by agents of the Federal Security Service, Russia's internal security and counterintelligence agency, per the Dossier Center.

Further entries also revealed dozens of undercover offices and facilities used by the Federal Protective Service, which is responsible for guarding Russia's top leaders, and the Federal Security Service, the outlet wrote.

Many of these locations have already been identified as Russian intelligence facilities by investigative outlets such as Bellingcat , the Dossier Center noted.

Facilities and safe houses in the Primorsky, Leningrad, St. Petersburg, and Bryansk regions were also on the list, the Dossier Center wrote, showing screenshots of the document.

A spokesperson for the Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside regular business hours.

yardi voyager document management

Watch: Female spy ring working for Russia busted in Ukraine

yardi voyager document management

  • Main content

2018 Primetime Emmy & James Beard Award Winner

R&K Insider

Join our newsletter to get exclusives on where our correspondents travel, what they eat, where they stay. Free to sign up.

A History of Moscow in 13 Dishes

Featured city guides.

IMAGES

  1. Yardi Voyager Reviews, Demo & Pricing

    yardi voyager document management

  2. Yardi Voyager Review: Pricing, Pros, Cons & Features

    yardi voyager document management

  3. Yardi

    yardi voyager document management

  4. Yardi Voyager SAML Single Sign-On (SSO)

    yardi voyager document management

  5. Voyager Ports

    yardi voyager document management

  6. Yardi Voyager Pricing, Alternatives & More 2022

    yardi voyager document management

VIDEO

  1. yardi promotions feature (TES HOUSE CALL SERVICES) We do installs and maintenance services Florida

  2. Yardi Systems, Inc Yardi Voyager Google Chrome 2021 10 28 10 00 43

  3. Yardi Software V/s Persistent

  4. Unlocking Property Management Insights: Extracting and Analyzing Yardi Data

  5. Episode 8: 3 Skills for Leasing Agents with Drew Davis

  6. Yardi Voyager Converting Data: Data Conversion Orchestration

COMMENTS

  1. Document Management for SharePoint

    Find Documents Easily Quickly locate documents with tenant names, addresses, system codes and other familiar search criteria from Voyager. learn more + Empower Your Business

  2. Yardi Property Management Software

    Property Management Software Multiple platforms to meet your property management software needs Choose from two innovative platforms designed for real estate management: Yardi Voyager and Yardi Breeze. Both include accounting, operations and ancillary services for residential and commercial portfolios.

  3. Yardi Orion for SharePoint to Provide Business Intelligence and

    Along with business intelligence, Yardi Orion also enables synchronized document management that allows documents to be securely accessed and updated from Yardi Voyager and SharePoint, preconfigured employee intranet portals, and portals for property marketing and resident services that include online lease execution and resident payments.

  4. Document Management for SharePoint

    Document Management for SharePoint Manage content efficiently for ultimate collaboration Leverage the best of Yardi Voyager and Microsoft® SharePoint® to increase productivity and communication across your business. Centralise key documents and enterprise information in a secure, mobile-enabled system. Centralise Content Management

  5. Yardi Voyager Reviews, Pricing and Features

    Yardi Voyager features a central document management system (DMS) as well, allowing employees throughout the organization to access the same materials from a centralized database. The system is also equipped with a real-time analytics module, including custom reports, employee training support, maintenance management, renters' insurance ...

  6. Yardi Voyager Property Management

    Get Pricing. Write a Review. Yardi Voyager is a web-based fully-integrated property management software for larger residential and commercial portfolios. The solution manages your operations, executes leasing, generates analytics, and provides services to your residents, tenants, and investors. Yardi Voyager is a comprehensive system for real ...

  7. Arcadia Management Group Inc. Adopts New Yardi Solution

    SANTA BARBARA, Calif., Oct. 24, 2017 - Arcadia Management Group Inc. is one of the first adopters of Yardi ® Document Management for SharePoint, an innovative new product which integrates Yardi Voyager ® data with Microsoft ® SharePoint ® for a single, centralized content management solution.

  8. Yardi Voyager Features

    An easy to read, often single page, real-time user interface, showing a graphical presentation of the current status and historical trends of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to enable instantaneous and informed decisions to be made at a glance. 122 reviewers of Yardi Voyager have provided feedback on this feature.

  9. Mastering Document Management

    With seamless integration of your document management system with your Voyager property management system and other Yardi platforms (including RentCafe, Procure to Pay, Aspire) it's easier for approved users inside and outside your organization to upload files. Security is managed in Voyager.

  10. A Comprehensive Introduction to the Yardi Voyager Property Management

    yardi voyager training manual pdf-4yvtm7 (1) - Read online for free. This document is a training manual for Yardi Voyager in PDF format. It was created on May 29, 2019 and is 1,381 KB in size. The manual includes an introduction, description of main topics, technical notes, and a glossary to explain key terms. It aims to provide information about using Yardi Voyager and related topics.

  11. Yardi Orion for SharePoint to Provide Business Intelligence and

    Yardi Orion for SharePoint to Provide Business Intelligence and Document Management for Yardi Voyager Clients. Contacts. Yardi Systems Inc. Joel Nelson 800-866-1144 x1255 [email protected].

  12. Yardi Updates Online Training Courses to Help HOTMA Implementation

    If your affordable housing organization or PHA uses Yardi Voyager®, contact your sales representative now for a demonstration of Yardi Aspire. PHAs and affordable housing providers who are not Yardi clients can visit yardi.com or call (800) 866-1144 for a demonstration of the Yardi Affordable Housing and Yardi PHA suites.

  13. What is MoSCoW Prioritization?

    MoSCoW prioritization, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a popular prioritization technique for managing requirements. The acronym MoSCoW represents four categories of initiatives: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won't-have, or will not have right now. Some companies also use the "W" in MoSCoW to mean "wish.".

  14. Multifamily Rents Remain Flat in January, Reports Yardi Matrix

    The average asking rent stood at $1,710 in January. SANTA BARBARA, Calif., Feb. 14, 2024 - The multifamily market was stable at the start of 2024, despite the pressure of a supply boom in some markets, according to the latest Yardi® Matrix National Multifamily Report.. The average U.S. asking rent remained flat at $1,710 in January for a 0.5 percent year-over-year increase, while occupancy ...

  15. Russia mistakenly doxxes its own secret bases and spies

    In one case, the document even included the apartment numbers of two homes used by spies in Moscow, the Dossier Center said. A list of residential addresses also revealed at least six apartment buildings in Moscow that contain homes sold or given to intelligence officers in the Foreign Intelligence Service, Russia's top external intelligence ...

  16. Russia Accidentally Doxes Own Spies and Secret Bases: Dossier Center

    Several officials signed the document, including Moscow's mayor, Sergey Sobyanin, the Dossier Center reported. While most of the list covered the addresses of public institutions like metro ...

  17. 21 Things to Know Before You Go to Moscow

    1: Off-kilter genius at Delicatessen: Brain pâté with kefir butter and young radishes served mezze-style, and the caviar and tartare pizza. Head for Food City. You might think that calling Food City (Фуд Сити), an agriculture depot on the outskirts of Moscow, a "city" would be some kind of hyperbole. It is not.