trek madone 2.1 2017

• off.road.cc
• Dealclincher
• Fantasy Cycling

Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

• Sportive and endurance bikes
• Gravel and adventure bikes
• Urban and hybrid bikes
• Touring bikes
• Cyclocross bikes
• Electric bikes
• Folding bikes
• Fixed & singlespeed bikes
• Children's bikes
• Time trial bikes
• Accessories - misc
• Computer mounts
• Bike bags & cases
• Bottle cages
• Child seats
• Lights - front
• Lights - rear
• Lights - sets
• Pumps & CO2 inflators
• Puncture kits
• Reflectives
• Smart watches
• Stands and racks
• Arm & leg warmers
• Base layers
• Gloves - full finger
• Gloves - mitts
• Jerseys - casual
• Jerseys - long sleeve
• Jerseys - short sleeve
• Shorts & 3/4s
• Tights & longs
• Bar tape & grips
• Bottom brackets
• Brake & gear cables
• Brake & STI levers
• Brake pads & spares
• Cassettes & freewheels
• Chainsets & chainrings
• Derailleurs - front
• Derailleurs - rear
• Gear levers & shifters
• Handlebars & extensions
• Inner tubes
• Quick releases & skewers
• Energy & recovery bars
• Energy & recovery drinks
• Energy & recovery gels
• Heart rate monitors
• Hydration products
• Hydration systems
• Indoor trainers
• Power measurement
• Skincare & embrocation
• Training - misc
• Cleaning products
• Lubrication
• Tools - multitools
• Tools - Portable
• Tools - workshop
• Books, Maps & DVDs
• Camping and outdoor equipment
• Gifts & misc

Madones have changed lots over the years and there are loads of different variants in the current line up. This is the first model year that Trek have offered the Madone with an aluminium frame; it has been wall-to-wall carbon fibre up until now (they've introduced aluminium Domanes for the first time too). The 2 Series models are made from Trek's 200 Series Alpha Aluminium, and some of the top-end features have had to be sacrificed.

Frame: Carbon Madone's kissing cousin from Bauxite County

For example, Trek make a big noise about their KVF tube shaping, KVF standing for Kammtail Virtual Foil. Essentially, they've designed a deep, aerodynamically efficient tube profile and chopped off the trailing edge to reduce weight and improve handling while retaining the aero performance.

Trek make extensive use of KVF tubing on the 6 Series Madone that we reviewed a few months back , whereas the KVF on the 2 Series is limited to the down tube and the fork legs.

That isn't really surprising given that the bike is five grand cheaper and the frame is made of aluminium. The point is, though, that Trek use the Madone name to cover a range of bikes that are significantly different from one another. They're all sporty to some degree or another and they share some design cues, but they're sometimes distant cousins rather than siblings.

That's not to say that the 2.1 is deficient when it comes to high-quality features. The head tube, for instance, is tapered with a standard 1 1/8in bearing at the top and a 1 1/2in bearing at the bottom, that extra material in the frame and fork helping to provide a good level of front-end stiffness.

The bottom bracket is a BB86.5 design with the bearings pressed into the shell, removing the need for cups and threads and reducing weight, and also allowing the down tube to be made wider for increased stiffness, while the gear cables run internally. Well, mostly. The rear mech cable exits the frame underneath the bottom bracket and does the last leg out in the open.

Both the frame and carbon-legged fork feature mudguard mounts. They're going to be very useful for UK conditions and we can imagine lots of people using the 2.1 for commuting, among other things. The mounts sit just behind the dropouts and run forwards rather than sideways, so they're hardly noticeable when not in use. In fact, after several weeks of riding this bike, I had to head back to the garage to double check they were even there. They were, and there's another mudguard-fixing hole on the back of the seat tube.

The carbon legged fork has that KVF shaping that I mentioned above and it's SpeedTrap compatible. That means you can fit a Trek computer sensor into a pocket in one of the legs. Okay, a lot of people use GPS systems these days, but it's a neat option if you don't want to rely on those pesky satellites.

In terms of geometry, the 2 Series Madones are built to Trek's H2 fit. What does that mean? Funny you should ask. It means that the head tube is slightly extended over Trek's low and aero H1 fit. It's still a sporty road bike arrangement, but not quite as aggressive.

So, our 58cm review bike has a 19cm head tube and an effective top tube of 57.4cm. For comparison, the 6 Series Madone that we reviewed a few months ago came in an H1 fit (it's available in H2 as well). That had a 16cm head tube and a 57.9cm effective top tube. The 2.1 has a 59.8cm stack and a 39.1cm reach, while the 6 Series has a 56.9cm stack and a 40.5cm reach.

If you don't want to decode those figures for yourself, the top and bottom of it is that you can get a ride position on the 2.1 that's a little more relaxed without the need to add a bunch of headset spacers. Go for a short head tube with a load of spacers and you'll compromise front-end stiffness. If you want a higher front end, you're better off having the height supplied by the head tube.

Some flexible folk might prefer a lower front end, especially for racing or just for riding as fast, while others are going to be happy with a higher front end for more comfort. It's up to you; Trek offer a whole load of bikes in each fit. And bear in mind that although the H2 is relaxed, it's not that  relaxed. A 58cm Specialized Roubaix, for example, has a 22.5cm head tube.

Components: Dependable Shimano 105

Moving on to the build, the shifters and mechs are from Shimano's mid-level 105 groupset, which is the most common group that you'll find on £1,000 bikes. It's solid, reliable kit – durable and functional.

You can adjust the reach to the levers by adding shims, the hoods are very comfortable to rest your hands on, and the mechs will probably carry on working for ages with relatively little maintenance.

The chainset isn't 105, though, it's a Shimano R565 compact option, so you get 50-tooth and 34-tooth chainrings rather than a standard 53/39T or 52/39T. That means you get a lower set of ratios to get you up the hills at the expense of big gears for pinning it down the other side.

It makes a lot of sense for most people who will gladly take the rest if they run out of big gears and enjoy the view instead. The Shimano Tiagra cassette it's matched up to runs sprockets from 12-tooth right up to 30-tooth.

The ride: No alarms and no surprises

I'd love to tell you that the Madone behaved really unexpectedly out on the road. It makes for a better story if a bike does something you don't anticipate, either good or bad. But the truth is that this bike behaves exactly as it should without any real surprises.

At 9.1kg (20.06lb), the 2.1 is never going to be the fastest bike out of the blocks, and acceleration is probably its weakest feature. The wheels from in-house brand Bontrager are solid enough but they're not especially keen to start zipping along – you don't get that exciting feeling of super-fast acceleration – but that's all forgotten once you get up to speed.

In terms of comfort, that ride position I mentioned is all-important. I'm used to quite a sporty setup and I didn't feel this was a vast distance away from that. You don't sit so upright that you feel as if the wind is blowing you backwards – it's a long way off that. Put it this way: if a full-on race set up is described as aggressive, maybe this is a passive aggressive ride position. Just putting it out there.

I can't say that I'm not a big fan of Bontrager's Affinity 1 saddle. It's a bit too spongy and mushy for my taste. Brands often do this with bikes up to about this price, probably on the basis that people walking into bike shops often equate soft with comfortable. They're wrong. It's not a disaster but I'd be ditching it early on if I bought this bike.

The gel bar tape softens the alloy front end so your hands and wrists feel fine throughout long rides and, as I said earlier, the hoods on the 105 levers provide another comfy hold. If you're like most people, you'll spend most of your time with your hands up here and when you do want to move to the drops, it's a comparatively short distance down there – just 125mm – which makes things easier on your back and neck. Passive aggressive, as I said before.

Whack the chain into the small chainring and the biggest sprocket and you have a really low gear (29.8in, if you're interested in such things) that'll get you up pretty much anything that doesn't need rope ladders and overhanging rocks. You won't get up the hills especially fast in a gear this small, but you'll be able to keep chugging along even when you have a day's riding behind you and your muscles have waved a little white flag.

Coming down the hills, the 2.1 feels planted rather than skittish, even over dodgy surfaces, and the front end doesn't waver when you chuck it hard into a bend. The no-name dual-pivot brakes might not have the cred of branded up options but in practice, they perform well enough and will do even better if you upgrade the pads when the first set wear out.

Conclusion: Gets the job done

Overall, the 2.1 is a well-designed, well-executed bike that gets on with the job with very little fuss. It's not carbon, it's not mega-light, and if you were being harsh you might say that it's not the most exciting choice out there at this price, but it is solid, reliable and dependable and good value for money – and there's a lot to be said for that.

Solid, good value road bike that'll see you right for everything from commuting to all-day sportives.

road.cc test report

Make and model: Trek Madone 2.1

Size tested: 58cm

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame 200 Series Alpha Aluminium, E2, KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shape, press-fit BB

Fork Madone KVF carbon, E2, SpeedTrap compatible

Wheels Aluminium hubs w/Bontrager Approved aluminium rims

Tyres Bontrager R1, 700x23c

Shifters Shimano 105 STI, 10 speed

Front derailleur Shimano 105, 34.9mm clamp

Rear derailleur Shimano 105

Crank Shimano R565, 50/34 (compact)

Cassette Shimano Tiagra 12-30, 10 speed

Saddle Bontrager Affinity 1, steel rails

Seatpost Bontrager Race, infinite tilt adjustment, 20mm offset

Handlebar Bontrager Race VR-C, 31.8mm

Stem Bontrager Race Lite, 31.8mm, 7 degree

Headset Integrated, cartridge bearings, sealed, aluminium, 1-1/8in top, 1.5in bottom

Brakeset Aluminium dual-pivot brakes w/Shimano 105 STI levers

Tape Bontrager Gel Cork

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Trek say, "Finally, an aluminium road bike worthy of the Madone name, with a super-aero shape and next-level race technology. Incredible ride, incredible value."

The Madone 2.1 doesn't have much in common with the top-end Madones – so little that you can't really see that having the name cover them all is much more than a marketing exercise to extend some of that top-end cred. Whatever they call it, this is a very good do-it-all road bike for the money.

Frame and fork

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame is 200 Series Alpha Aluminium. The fork is carbon legs/alloy steerer.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

It's built to Trek's H2 fit. See the main text for all the details.

Riding the bike

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?

A tiny amount on the 58cm frame. Not a worry.

The drivetrain

Wheels and tyres, your summary.

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? Perhaps bit of a 'safe' choice, but solid reliability has a lot going for it.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? Yes.

Overall rating: 8 /10

About the tester

Age: 41   Height: 190cm   Weight: 75kg

I usually ride:    My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years   I ride: Most days   I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding,

Help us to fund our site

We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99. 

If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content

If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

10 comments.

The road bike that got me back into road bikes after riding mtb for 30 yrs, great bike

• Log in or register to post comments

Are you kidding. BB30 is the worst possible standard in Bottom Brackets.

Shimano's standard still seems to be the best, very much so.

It's a shame that your twitting @ sign thing looks like it says "Trek bikes suk" at first glance.

I wish Trek would adopt a BB30 so Shimano would start making BB30 cranksets

Been in a muddle about a cycle scheme bike recently. Looked at this, the same(near) priced, giant, scott & specialized. The scott s20 had full 105, the rest was a tiagra/tekro(?) or summat mishmash.

-planet x and ribble offered best value for money - mainly carbon with a full groupset.

It depends what you want.

Don't understand why this gets 4 stars, when last year's Bike of the Year only got 4.5? Are you saying this is nearly Bike of the Year material? Really?

Rough welding round the bottom bracket too.

Floor Filler.

Just for clarification, the Domane is a high-performance bike, as well as the Madone. Yes, the emphasis of the Domane is that of comfort over a longer distance, but it's just as much a bike for people who want to go fast.

The difference between the two will ultimately come down to what type of ride someone wants to experience. If you want to feel that you are well-connected to the road, then you want a Madone. If you want to reduce the 'white noise' that comes with riding a typical UK road surface, then opt for a Domane.

Both performance bikes. Both with oodles of technology. Both with unique ride qualities.

A comfort bike should have at least 25c tires. I hate it when companies cheap out on things like cassettes by down speccing them hoping buyers won't notice.

Is it the 2.1 or the 2.3? Just curious.

Can't help but think that for a 'comfort road' bike you might as well buy the Domane though.

Latest Comments

Thanks for the question. EK Spinner's comment below explains why riding 2 abreast is advisable. We do it more now as a protection and to create a...

During breaks in the Roadcc game, some players might get bored, while others might use the time for a quick break or to chat with fellow players....

[dupe deleted]

been a popular recent theme amongst the local papers, theyre all owned by the same group, its like they get an idea for a story and just keep copy,...

More expensive than Carradice.  Wow !!!  I'm sure something else important comes from Nelson. What is it? 

Joe Dombrowski had a characteristically clear and considered take on it in a chat with the cycling podcast last week. He felt there are a number of...

I have a pair of their gravel wheels and knocked up 4000km off road without issue and they have done 2 touring trips with 15kg of backpacking gear....

Totally this. One of my near miss submissions illustrated this. Shoulder check - motorist entering filter lane thinking the vehicle in front was...

They don't like it up 'em! 

I certainly agree with your final sentence: it is, in it's own way, as beautiful as a sunset, or mountain scene, bucolic pastoral etc...And the...

Related Reviews

Orbea Orca Aero M10iLTD 2024

Stunningly fast without sacrificing versatility, handling or comfort

Boardman SLR 8.6

Comfortable, lively ride, an excellent gear range and well-chosen components – one of the best entry-level bikes you can buy

Fara F/Road

Quick, nimble, fun, an impressive ride quality and excellent comfort – and I think it looks stunning

Factor O2 VAM

A master of climbing – but a bike that's also incredible fun and extremely capable everywhere else

• Lapierre X Lite 400 FDJ review
• Scott Addict R4 review
• Condor Bellissima review
• Santa Cruz Driver 8 review
• Titanium Hardtail Comparison – Five Ti Hardtails Put To The Test

Your cart is empty

The argument in favor of using filler text goes something like this: If you use arey real content in the Consulting Process anytime you reachtent.

Mountain Bikes

Parts & Components

Contact info.

Trek Madone 2.1 review

• by Cyclesgo

Thanks in part to its association with That Texan and a long pedigree of superbly performing bike models, the Madone name is one of the best-known in road cycling. It’s perhaps a bit of gamble then for Trek to slap the branding of its most famous carbon bike on an aluminium-framed machine – but has it paid off? The sub-£1,000 price point is one of the most hotly contested. With an update to 11-speed Shimano 105 shifters and a price drop to £900 for 2015, the Madone 2.1 holds its own against online-only competition. It’s a solid bike for those who aspire to own the Madone label without handing over £5,900 for the carbon version.

Ride and handling: buzzy but reliable

In Trek’s world, we’ve got the Domane for comfort, the Emonda for climbing and the Madone for racing fast – but the aluminium 2.1 isn’t really a flat-back, head-down racer. The H2 geometry means a taller head-tube (150mm for our 54cm size) for a more upright position than the carbon H1 models. It’s comfortable without stretching, you can tuck low easily and you don’t feel like you’re going backwards when sitting up.

This means a Marin DSX FS do-it-all setup that enables you to get on with riding and offers assured control in almost every scenario. Whether you’re whipping around tight bends, holding stable in crosswinds or adjusting a line when flashing downhill, the 2.1 offers fuss-free handling that’s neutral and reliable. This isn’t to damn it with faint praise though. Lack of excitement when it comes to handling isn’t a bad thing – you can hold plenty of speed around corners, descend with confidence and relax to enjoy riding.

Unfortunately, the ride quality can endanger that fun at times though. We’ve got a feeling Trek had an image of the bike zipping along a perfectly smooth highway when the 2.1’s frame was designed. Take the Madone for a spin on good roads it feels sensational, holding its speed well despite the resistance of fairly heavy wheels that make accelerations suffer. Whether or not the internal cabling and flat-backed KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) down tube shape aid aerodynamics, it certainly feels fast and satisfying when you’re pushing towards a PB.

On the other hand, rougher surfaces really dent the fun, the carbon blades of the tapered fork doing little to calm the chattering vibrations through the frame at the front end. Descending on imperfect lanes proved the biggest worry, with jolts forcing bum and saddle separation and the continued staccato vibrations then battering the backside as the bike Marin DSX Road skittered downwards – even with only 110psi in the tyres. This isn’t going to happen every time you take on a descent, but it’s a pity that the well-behaved and otherwise planted handling can sometimes come unstuck because of this lack of ride smoothness, creating a tense riding experience. To try and combat this we’d put some suppler 25mm tyres and a carbon seatpost on the upgrade list.

On the uphills though – terrain upon which the Madone performs well for a bike weighing 8.9kg – it’s a refreshingly different story. Especially when riding hard, the 2.1’s stiffness gives a quick response and unhampered power transfer when stamping out authority on climbs. With the spot-on geometry and wide gear range, it’s just as adept at helping you spin to a summit too. The Marin Gestalt 2 front end feels light – and even a bit twitchy with hands on the tops – and while you can feel the weight a bit at the back end, there’s no sense of frustration that the bike’s holding you back.

Frame: fancily formed aluminium

The Madone 2.1 uses Trek’s top-grade Alpha 200-series aluminium, which thanks to hydroforming techniques has allowed for the flattened top tube and KVF down tube shapes, the latter of which being essentially an aerofoil shape that’s had the back cut off, increasing stiffness and decreasing weight while aiding aerodynamics.

The Marin Gestalt X11 down tube has a flat rear edge for stiffness, handling in crosswinds while still giving an aero edge from the front-facing aerofoil shape: the down tube has a flat rear edge for stiffness, handling in crosswinds while still giving an aero edge from the front-facing aerofoil shape The flat shapes also give a smooth, clean look more akin to a carbon frame, though the overall look and shaping remains a far cry from the carbon Madone. The rest of the tubing is a more traditional cylindrical shape and is welded fairly inconspicuously. The oversized BB86.5 bottom bracket means no external bearing cups and allows the wider BB junction that aids stiffness to give the bike its punchy power transfer.

The Marin Gestalt X10 gear cabling is internally routed, entering at the top of the down tube and exiting at the bottom bracket for the rear derailleur. The rear brake takes a more conventional course under the top tube. This isn’t really too much of a disappointment – as any internal routing at this price is a bonus – but it just reminds you far removed the alloy Madone is from its illustrious namesake. The head tube is tapered for increased front-end stiffness, which was remarkably solid throughout testing. The accompanying fork features carbon blades, complete with KVF trailing edges, and an alloy steerer – standard at this price point. It also includes a built-in SpeedTrap module for transmitting speed and distance data to a head unit via a Trek computer sensor and spoke-mounted magnet. In addition the 2.1 comes complete with mudguard mounts on fork and frame.

Equipment: savvy selections for 11-speed value

For 2015, the Madone 2.1 makes the leap to 11-speed with Shimano 105 shifters, allowing a wide, largely gap-free gear range when accompanied by the matching 11-28 105 cassette. There’s no skimping on the derailleurs either, which are 105 too, though there’s an RS500 five-bolt 50/34 compact crankset rather than the gorgeous new four-bolt design that’s trickled down from Dura-Ace and Ultegra.

Shifting performance was flawless throughout and until Shimano’s high-end groups go 12-speed, there’s little to recommend them over these workhorse components. Our only criticism of the drivetrain is in the internal BB bearings, which became sticky after a few weeks, stopping the cranks from turning as freely as they should. The Marin Gestalt 1 brakes are also a bit disappointing, the un-branded calipers lacking the power of Shimano’s versions.

The 2.1 is supplied with Bontrager’s TLR tubeless-ready wheels, which have low-profile, slightly rounded rims that are 19mm wide. Like the rest of the 2.1, they’re solid and free from flex, but aren’t particularly light and didn’t do us any favours in drag sprints from standing, taking a while to get up to speed. They’re a good set of training wheels, but the bike could really fly on the flats and hills with an upgrade to a lighter set. The Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite tyres, meanwhile, are 23mm wide and seemed fairly puncture prone, causing us grief on a few occasions.

The Marin Gestalt 2.5 remainder of the finishing kit also comes from Trek’s component brand. The simple alloy seatpost has a red anodised clamp that matches the seat collar, gear hanger, odd headset spacer and stem top cap, giving a classy look. The stem itself is white to match the frame, but comes with a blue anodised faceplate. The bars are standard 31.8mm with a comfy compact drop, wrapped in white gel cork tape, which quickly became grubby. The Bontrager Paradigm 1 saddle features a central cutout and was surprisingly comfy despite its rather squidgy padding, though an upgrade to something slightly harder might benefit riders going long.

So is the 2.1 really a Madone? No. It’s a fine aluminium bike that shows off Trek’s usual quality, but it’s so distant from the carbon models that it’s not really comparable. Sadly, the fact it is branded as such – inviting unfair comparisons – doesn’t do the 2.1 any favours. When it comes down to it, the occasionally harsh ride is the one characteristic that poses the biggest question for potential buyers – do you really need the benefit of internal cabling and a more aero down tube for the kind of riding you’re doing?

If you’re going to be racing and want every ounce of power you can get your legs on, it may well be the winning choice, though it’s up against stiff competition from the likes of Giant and Boardman at this price point. If you want all-day, long-ride comfort or value distance over speed go for Trek’s Domane instead. Check out the gallery above for more pictures of the Trek Madone 2.1.

Share This Post:

Ridley x-night 20 disc review, scott addict 20 review, related post.

Trek Domane SL5 review

Isaac Boson review

Marin Gestalt X11 review

Lapierre Pulsium Ultimate review

De Rosa SK Pininfarina review

Raleigh Mustang Comp review

Search This Blog

This is the blog for Scheller's Fitness and Cycling. Find posts about events in the community, cycling products, fitness products and other interesting and useful bike and fitness information.

• 2014 Madone 2.1
• 2014 road bikes
• 2014 Trek 2.1
• 2014 Trek Madone
• 2014 Trek Madone 2.1
• 2014 Trek Madone Road bike
• 2014 Trek road bikes
• schellers fitness and cycling

Excellent Entry-Level Road Bike From Trek: 2014 Madone 2.1

Refined aluminum road bike: 2014 madone 2.1. worthy of the madone name. super-aero shape and next level race technology. incredible ride, incredible value..

Oh ! This is a good share my company imp source click to read more

Nice blog!! Thanks for sharing this information. No doubt that the trek bikes are the best to have. Trek hybrid bikes are versatile, easy-riding bikes that will carry you wherever you want to go. They prove to be light, fun, and comfortable companions mile after mile. Here you get the full information about which is the best trek hybrid bike . Read the reviews so that you can choose the best one as per your needs. Diamondback Vital 2 Top 3 Best Bags For Bikes

Post a Comment

Our locations:, popular posts, 2014 trek 7.2 fx | bike review | scheller's fitness and cycling, 2015 trek x-caliber 6 is packed with features and looks great.

• International edition
• Australia edition
• Europe edition

On the road: Trek Madone 2.1

O nce upon a time, not so long ago, there was only really one reason anyone bought a Trek Madone. Lance Armstrong had won the Tour de France multiple times astride one of these Yankee beauties and there was a certain kind of man who was rich and delusional enough to pay £5,000-plus for a hoped-for shortcut to cycling greatness.

How things change. Not only is Armstrong no longer a Tour de France winner , but Madones have suddenly become rather more affordable. Not everyone will approve. When I bought the 2.1 home, my boyfriend, a terrible bicycle snob, tapped the frame and sniffed disapprovingly. "It's not even carbon fibre," he tutted. This aluminium imposter had no place calling itself a Madone, he said, as if Louis Vuitton had started making bags from hemp.

Then he noticed the pedals. Like most high-end bikes, the Madone came without any: manufacturers generally assume that anyone willing to spend a grand on a bike will want to fit their own clipless pedals to work in harmony with their own special bike shoes. I am not beyond such frippery, but when I went to make the switch, I found that my SPDs were stuck solid to my road bike, almost certainly because I'd failed to grease the threads when I fitted them four years ago. Unwilling to spend much on a review bike I knew I couldn't keep, I put on the cheapest pair I could find in Cycle Surgery, some £9.99 clodhoppers. My boyfriend was ashamed, as if he'd spotted me smothering tuna tartare with salad cream.

Shunned but undeterred, I set off on a dizzying solo whizz around the lanes of Epping Forest in a pair of trainers. Each turn of my inglorious pedals seemed to propel me twice as far and fast as my own bike. Going back to my old steed was like returning to a dial-up modem after high-speed broadband. My old triple chainset seemed unnecessary, an embarrassment; my shifters sluggish. It was as if I'd had a glamorous affair and returned home to view my old love through new, critical eyes. I'm not sure our relationship will ever be the same.

It's not perfect. Women may find the brakes a touch too far away, and they'll likely want to switch for a female-specific saddle. You don't have to spend £1,000 to get an aluminium-framed, carbon-forked bike either – my boyfriend has a full-carbon Planet X for the same price (never rated it myself).

And are you comfortable lining Armstrong's pockets? Trek may have binned him from its marketing literature in the wake of the US Anti-Doping Agency's report, but he still owns a small share in the company.

Trek Madone 2.1

Price £1,000 Forks Carbon Frame Aluminium Gears 10 (Shimano, double chainset) Chance of turning you into a Tour de France winner who will be stripped of your titles in a gargantuan doping scandal? Nil

• Motoring: On the road
• Lance Armstrong

Comments (…)

Most viewed.

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek 2.1 Road Bike

Trek's 2.1 boasts a lightweight Alpha Black aluminum frame with a road-carving carbon fork. The hill-conquering Shimano drivetrain and Bontrager's SSR wheelset will have you rolling farther and faster than you thought possible. Plus, it sports a fine selection of Bontrager components, too, including a comfy saddle and a carbon seatpost.

• USER REVIEWS

Trek knows how to make a great road bike. The geometry is spot on, and the setup is right where it needs to be for a bike placed right under the carbon brothers. Very stiff and well suited for a larger rider. Concrete Pumping Modesto

Can't find any.

Lightweight, comfortable, plenty of gears.

Just bought this bike used (30 miles on it per owner), from the original owner for much less (about 1/3) of what was originally paid for it and Love it! I'm a newbie to road biking and this is my 2nd used bike purchase. I had this one fitted, changed the seat & bought pedals, clips & shoes. Huge difference after fitting and only cost $40 for fitting & $109 for new seat. I've been having a few issues with fatigue and hurting body parts so this should be corrected. The bike is in Mint condition and very fun to ride. Also love the blue/white color scheme. I highly recommend this bike if you can find used in the condition I did.

Similar Products Used:

Trek 2100 Pro Carbon

Strength- handles like a dream. Easy to work on. Very lightweight. Very fast compared to my Trek 7.2 Frankenstein bike lol

Had some creaks and clicks. ( fixed for now)

So this is an older bike, but it's my first legit Roadie.. I am 42 and started riding in1979 on a huffy progressing to BMX , Freestyle, and various Mtb over the years. I have been trying to destroy my trek 7.2 but it runs and runs - I am in Atlanta and that bike is a must have. Total chaos here. Anyways back to the review. Contacted a fellow off CL and agree upon date and time picked it up for $180 included computer and saddle bag. I almost couldn't believe it, but the guy had more $ than sense so I paid him and was on my way. I have ridden 50 miles this week on it and totally dig it. Very fast, nimble, light, looks cool. Decent components, good rubber, shifts well. Had a creak in it - was the pedals. Cleaned and lubed the cassette and chain, adjusted front derailers and am now good to go. I recommend this bike. It may be older but she has it where it counts.

A really light aluminium/carbon frame (2009 iteration). Relatively light RSS wheels. Speed Trap cavity in fork. Feels as if it wants to go. Lively.

The aluminium steerer, and that Bontrager stopped selling replacement forks for Trek road bikes. The Crane Creek IS40 bearings suck. The corrode too easily. I had to heat the headtube up to get them out last time and ruined the decals on the front. I aim to replace the 40s with stainless steel 110s eventually. The lack of availability of replacement rims and hub parts. A bit on the heavy side (mostly due to the group set: no-name aluminium/steel calliper breaks, tiagra shifters, front deraileur, FSA crank, tiagra cassette and 105 rear dérailleur. The lack of a 53/39 crankset option. Weight.

Stock, 2009 2.1 was heavier than it needed to be. I've had the bike stripped down to just the frame, minus the fork, and it is light as a feather. Since my purchase in 2009, I have replaced the group set with Dura Ace 7900 across the board, including the pedals. I have also gone through a number of saddles in an attempt to find comfort on long trips. I have settled and am happy with the Bontrager Affinity RS. Just those two changes have brought the weight of the bike down by four pounds. I am currently building a set of wheels with Stan's No-tubes rims, Tune hubs and Sapim spokes that should bring the bike down another few pounds. I am aiming for 17lbs. My greatest frustration is that fork. I would love to replace it with a full carbon fork, but Bontrager no longer advertises their sale. I assume because of liability issues. So I may opt for ENVE or 3T carbon fork, stem, handle bars/seat post combo to finish the bike off. Of course, we're talking a paint job on the white/apple seed blue fade . A shame. Overall, a good frame to build on! I wouldn't trade if for anything less then a Madone 5 series frame.

Good bike for first 1,000 miles. Easy to work on.

Uncomfortable saddle, Poor stock wheels and tires, Lack of durability in components. Overall lack of durability.

I bought this bike 3 years ago and have put over 5,000 miles on it. I immediately replaced the saddle as the stock saddle is really uncomfortable on long or multi-day rides. While it was a good bike for the first year or so, it has not held up well - I do not think it is a very durable bike. I've kept up with normal maintenance, but have had a lot of problems with the components over 3 years. I had to replace the wheels after about 1,000 miles - I am a 6'2" rider at 210 lbs and after 1,000 miles, they would not stay true - ended up with Mavic Ksyrium wheels and I love the Mavic wheels. The stock Bontrager wheels are way too flimsy for bigger riders. I've replaced the left shifter twice, the front derailleur once and the back derailleur once (as well as new chains every 1,500 miles and a new cassette at 3,500 miles). Every time I replace components, the bike works well for 250-500 miles but then starts shifting poorly or not shifting at all. Barrel (cable tension) and limit adjustments don't seem to fix the problem - it always ends up with component replacement. While this bike might be suitable for an occasional weekend rider, it just has not help up well for me. I've sunk well over $1,200 into repairs on this bike - with the money I've spent on purchase and repair, I would have been far better off to get a higher priced / more durable road bike. I am really disappointed in the lack of durability of the bike. I would not recommend this bike unless you have a shop nearby and a mechanic on speed dial.

Great frame, mostly good stock components, 105 groupset works for a beginner racer. Slick colors and graphics.

Wheels are heavy, saddle hurts on longer (> 40 mile) rides

I've now had my 2.1 for 2 years. This was my first proper road bike - before this I stuck to mountain bikes. I went for the H2 fit in a 50cm frame size (I'm 5'6" and weight 145 lbs). I lowered the stem one spacer to get a slightly lower riding position. The bike is fantastic. The frame is stiff, even while sprinting during criteriums. It climbs well, the ride is well damped, and handling is great. It can be a bit twitchy at lower speeds or while really sprinting hard and pulling on the handlebars (I figure most racing bikes are the same way), but it really rides beautifully when you just point it down a road and go. Cornering is very stable. This bike inspires confidence. Given what you pay for this bike, you are going to run into some compromises. The groupset is not 100% 105, but everything has held up well. The wheels are very, very heavy - I weighed the front wheel and I estimate it at a touch over 1 kilogram without tire and tube. However, they are sturdy wheels, and you can depend on them. (They also look pretty sweet.) Train with the heavy stock wheelset and switch to a lighter set for racing, and you'll really fly. The saddle is fine for shorter rides, but anything over an hour becomes painful. I'm now in the process of finding a good saddle for longer efforts. In summary, I love my bike. Yes, there are nicer, more expensive bikes, but for where I am as a novice racer and for a first road bike, this was a great choice and a great value. I would upgrade the wheels and saddle and save up for a dream bike, like a Time or Pinarello, but I'd still ride this one. It's a dependable companion.

Great bike/specs for the price. Like the 105 drivetrain - shifts well. Great starting intermediate bike with upgrade ability if needed. I got the H3 geometry - very comfortable with great handling.

Definitely stock saddle and tires. I only ride up to about 40 miles but after a handful of rides realized a more comfortable saddle was needed. Selle italia Flite as others have mentioned. I changed tires to Vittorio Pro Slick. Upgraded brakes to Ultegra after a good ebay find.

Mostly ride mountain bike but purchased the Trek 2.1 to help me lose some weight. Bike sat for a few months after I purchased but over the last 2 months I have been riding about 75 miles a week average over a couple rides. Dropped almost 30 lbs. Bike handles my 200 lbs no problem. Very cost efficient bike for me.

very agile when im off my saddle this bike flies.im a heavy set and this 2.1 can handle my legs with no problem. Takes me back to my racing days.

You don't need a very expensive bike. I can keep up to the so called pro riders that think that the bike makes the rider. But its the rider that makes the bike.

Good climber, sleak appearance

poor bontrager components, horrible saddle, heavy wheel set and tires

This is basically an advanced entry level road bike so for the price you have to expect that there will be some stock bike components that are cheaper and heavy. If you like riding fast I would definately recommend changing out the saddle, tires, and wheelset, which are all heavy. I upgraded to a sella italia flite saddle, reynolds solitude wheel set and conti gp 4000 tires, which all made a huge difference in the ride quality and speed. Overall though, I would recommend purchasing this bike if you don't want to break the bank on the purchase of a new bike and can upgrade components as time goes on.

Good value for the price.

Need to upgrade components to get weight down.

Bought this bike (red 2011) as a starter bike to use in triathlons. It works great! I upgraded the seat, handle bars, and wheels. I'm older and heavy set, but I am able to keep pace with a lot of the riders on carbon frames. The SSR wheels role quite good even though a bit heavy. I'm skeptical that a carbon frame is lighter unless you spend in the 3K range.

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classic Forums
• Beginner's Corner

Trek Madone 2.1?

• Add to quote

I bought a Trek MTB recently and have decided I need a road bike to get in more pedal time. I have 4 good lbs in my area selling Trek, Cannondale, Giant, and Specialized. I really like the sales staff at the Trek dealership and tend to spend more time there. I am still getting up to speed with components as it has been 20 yrs since I last owned a road bike and don't want to go less than Shimano 105's. I think I can get a 2013 2.1 at a good price but wanted some experienced advice. I will mainly sport ride with friends. Any advice will be greatly appreciated.  

Did you ride it? If it fits well, it sounds like a fine choice for your purpose. IME, it's a little tougher and a little more important to really nail the size and fit on a road bike than a mountain bike.  

Sales staff being friendly is good but how are they after purchase? Are the other shops just not friendly or you just like the ambience better at the Trek store? You can't limit yourself to just one brand because like AndrwSwitch said, fit is really important. It would really suck to get excellent service and be miserable on the bike. You can always buy another brand and still service your bike at that store if you wanted to. It's not like a car dealership; It's a bike shop. The only real difference in bike brands are the frames and nameplate. Partwise, they all use the same parts. Also, the 2.1 is a good bike. you can't go wrong with it, provided the bike fits you.  

They did not have anything over 56 in the 2.1. They had a couple 5 series but I did not want to ride one knowing I would overbuy on my first bike after riding one. I am 6'2" and they want to put me on a 58 and 60 and let me ride. They are getting one from another store for me to try. I want to be sure, perfectly sure, on the size. I really like the bike though.  

jleeasc said: They did not have anything over 56 in the 2.1. They had a couple 5 series but I did not want to ride one knowing I would overbuy on my first bike after riding one. I am 6'2" and they want to put me on a 58 and 60 and let me ride. They are getting one from another store for me to try. I want to be sure, perfectly sure, on the size. I really like the bike though. Click to expand...

If you are interested in a more relaxed / endurance bike, the Trek Domane 2 series will probably be in your price range at the shop. 58cm would likely be in the ball park for your height I am guessing if you are proportioned similarly to me - I wear 34 inch inseam pants and am 6'1" tall, and the Domane 58cm with a 10mm shorter stem fits me very nicely.  

Yep. 34"inseam.  

Still want the Trek but stopped by the lbs closest to my house today and found a 2012 Cannondale CAAD10 5 105 discounted as a holdover. It's my size and I am a little afraid to ride it since I want the Trek so badly. About 1700$ discounted to 1400$. If I offer 1200$ and they say yes, should I get it? I am closing on a re-fi tomorrow and will be getting a 1200$ check at closing due to an overestimate on the payoff. I figure if they take it, I will be getting a good bike at a good deal?  

I believe MSRP on the '12 CAAD10 5 was $1,670. $1,350 represents a little under a 20% discount which I think is a fair price for a year old model. You'll still be getting all the LBS services and a warranty. That aside, IMO you should 1) not be afraid to ride other bikes, and 2) not fret over price till you've ridden a few and whittled the field down to a couple. Price is moot if you don't like something about a bike.  

You can't go wrong with either of the bikes you're looking at. Looking at the 2013 Madone 2.1 specs it appears to be a full 105 gruppo. The 2012 Cannondale CAAD10 5 has Tektro R580 brakes which aren't bad, but I swapped them out for 105's ($100 upgrade). Everything else is about equal. At this point it's about fit and ride quality. Ride them both and see which one feels better. The more comfortable it is the longer you can stay on it.  

Rode the CAAD10 5 this afternoon and did like it. Think I would maybe like a more upright riding position, but I am a novice so it may be just fine after getting comfortable being back in the saddle again. Shop owner gave me some mod options to get the CAAD there. Want to ride the the relaxed posture(best way I can describe it) like the Synapse and others that you have suggested. Wanted to put this bike buying thing to bed this weekend but found there is alot to consider.  

You're going to have your bike awhile and (hopefully) spend a lot of time riding it, so I wouldn't rush the process. Besides, you are making progress, so just stay with it. Re: the CAAD, yes, flipping stems and/ or increasing their angle will serve to raise bars. And no matter what bike you choose, your fit will (slowly) evolve as saddle time builds and fitness improves. Still, I wouldn't suggest buying a bike that you're uncomfortable riding with the hope that someday you might get comfortable with it. Rather, find one that works with a moderate stem angle and spacers knowing you can slowly/ incrementally drop the bars if needed. Also, the CAAD's are race bikes, so stay with your your plan to ride relaxed geo bikes - it's a good one. Focus on the fit and feel of the bikes, but also try to enjoy the bike buying process. Test rides can be fun!  

The Domane that's in the same price range as the Madone 2.1 is the 2.0 and it has a Tiagra drivetrain, not 105. But Tiagra has become a lot better through the years. The bottom line is, Trek, C-dale, Giant and Specialized are all good brands, and you're looking at their better aluminum frames when you're in that price range. You can ride fast on an "endurance" frame. Not everyone can ride centuries comfortably on a race frame. I can, but that's me. You might find that the Madone isn't as "racy" to you as the CAAD. But you won't know until you ride one. As everyone else has said, don't rush into it. A good shop won't try to pressure you into a snap decision. The next bike bug is going to bite you soon enough as it is. The time to do that is when you're ready, not because you're miserable on the bike you bought 6 months ago. Ride as many as you can before you (lord how I hate the upcoming cliche) pull the trigger. :wink:  

One thing that I forgot to mention is that from looking at the specs, the CAAD has a standard 53/39 double crank, while with the Madone you get a choice of a compact 50/34 or a triple. I don't know anything about where you're riding. If you find that the gearing on the CAAD is too tall for you given your terrain and level of fitness, I don't know what's involved in swapping out the crank on it. I know they throw in a spare spider to make the swap on some of their Super Six models. You could also swap out the cassette for one with a 28t bail-out gear and see if that helps with the standard double. Just another factor to consider.  

Crap. Just got home from the Specialized dealer. Rode the Allez Elite alum frame and 2 carbons, the Roubaix Compact and the Roubaix Sport Compact. This was my first time on a carbon frame. I never knew, at my experience level, that I could notice that big of a difference in the ride. The Allez Elite was very nice but just not the riding posture I am looking for. Both Roubaix bikes were awesome feeling. I rode all 3 bikes downtown over different surfaces, broken pavement, sidewalks, RR track crossings, etc. Just feeling the cracks in the sidewalks on the carbon frame blew me away. It is such a softer, muffled feel compared to aluminum. The big difference in the 2 Roubaixs were the components(Sora on the Compact vs Tiagra and 105 derailleurs and shifters on the Sport). The Sport Compact was so cool that it made me giggle a little while I rode. Stopped by my Trek Dealer on the way home to see if they had a 3 series Domane or Madone but they had neither. They want to get the Domane in for me to ride but I feel bad asking for that if I end up going back after the Sport Compact. They are really nice and I don't want to screw with them. Started off with a 1000$ bike and now find myself lusting after a 2100$ bike. I WILL NOT ride anything higher for fear the move up will not end. Either of the Roubaix bikes and probably the Trek 3 series will make me happy for quite some time. BTW, I rode the Sport Compact 2nd and the Allez last.  

jleeasc said: Stopped by my Trek Dealer on the way home to see if they had a 3 series Domane or Madone but they had neither. They want to get the Domane in for me to ride but I feel bad asking for that if I end up going back after the Sport Compact. They are really nice and I don't want to screw with them. Click to expand...

I know if I was to do things over again, I would have invested in a much better road bike for my first bike. I now regret that I settled for aluminum back in 2008 and am now looking at carbon and putting out almost 3 grand more. I say go for the best that you can afford, especially if you can see yourself really getting a lot of use out of it.  

I have the opposite opinion of the same situation. I bought my first bike in 2010 and this summer I built up a nicer bike. The difference between them is a couple of extra gears, some carbon fiber, and about 2 pounds, but having invested all of that then would have meant nothing. On the up side I now have two bikes - so when the weather is junk or one of the bikes isn't running quite right I can grab the other one. I say buy the bike you can afford now and spend the extra on good quality, perfectly fitted accessories to make things as comfortable as possible. Invest in shoes, saddle, shorts, re-fitting after 6 months - any contact point on the bike. No point having a nicer bike with poorly fitting saddle or unsupportive shoes. Believe it or not but much of the cost of cycling is in accessories. Clothing, shoes, pedals, extra wheels, tools, saddles, are all transferable from one bike to another.  

^ This is what I did and just bought a Trek Madone 2.3. The frame is aluminum but it has 105's all the way around. I started looking at the 3 series for the carbon frame, but the derailleurs lowered to Tiagra and to be honest I didn't really notice the weight difference at that level. Both bikes handled well but I was happier with the cheaper model.  

All very good points to consider and remember. Thanks everyone.  

Think I should ride a Madone 3.1 and a Domane 4.0 also. Keep coming back to the Trek brand. Trouble will be finding one to test. Also wondering if I will be able to tell the diff in the 300 and 400 carbon. Obviously I have moved my price range up a bit. Figure I could get either in the 17-1800$ area. The Specialized dealer offered a mere 5% discount on the 2100$ Roubaix. No big deal though. It's his shop and according to him, he turns bikes frequently and doesn't see a need to discount. Think I am really hung up on getting an entry carbon frame.  

jleeasc said: Think I should ride a Madone 3.1 and a Domane 4.0 also. Keep coming back to the Trek brand. Trouble will be finding one to test. Also wondering if I will be able to tell the diff in the 300 and 400 carbon . Obviously I have moved my price range up a bit. Figure I could get either in the 17-1800$ area. The Specialized dealer offered a mere 5% discount on the 2100$ Roubaix. No big deal though. It's his shop and according to him, he turns bikes frequently and doesn't see a need to discount. Think I am really hung up on getting an entry carbon frame. Click to expand...

The components will be the big difference between 300 and 400 series as far as what you will notice, not the frames. When you move to a 500 series and up the saddle mast changes using a cap instead of a post for the saddle to mount to. The difference between these is noticeable but not huge enough to warrant the extra cost by itself IMHO, it's this plus the components that make it something that could be justified. You should ride a 2.3 Domane for comparison though to make sure you understand the different feel between carbon and aluminum on the Domane to decide if it's worth the extra money. Take each for a ride of at least an hour would be my advice.  

You guys really know your stuff. May need to write some of this down as I'll be heading back to the Trek LBS tomorrow. I really want a Trek but can't get that Roubaix out on my head although I haven't ridden the Domane yet, aluminum or carbon series. Kinda hoping I fall in love with the Domane 2 to save some cash.  

I did this and if he is a newbie like me, I doubt he will notice. That was the reason that I bought the 2.3.  

The Trek LBS can't get a Domane 60cm 4.0 until February. They are having trouble getting anything Domane under 5 series in my size. Everything is starting to point to the Roubaix if I want carbon. The component diff is the Roubaix has 105 shifters and rear derailleur compared to Tiagara on the 4.0, both having the same retail. The Roubaix also has a threaded BB, if that's important. Going back next week when they will have a 60cm Madone 2.1 to ride and then another ride on the Roubaix.  

Thank you all for your patience while I'm on this buying journey. I have posted in another thread that I have moved around alot and am now in the carbon frames. I love the Spec Roubaix but after some coaxing from the Trek dealer, I will be riding a Domane 4.5 tomorrow. Don't know if I'm fickle, scared I am going to make a bad decision, bike ignorant, or all of the above. My price target has moved up a bit too but hey, you only live once.  

IMHO, if you're going to invest more, invest in better accessories. Better fitting shoes, shorts, jerseys, saddle, have a major impact on comfort and long distance riding. I have two bikes now: one is a $3300 home-built Wilier with a carbon frame, and the other is a $1200 Trek 2.1 aluminum frame. Both fit me the same and both ride wonderfully. The Wilier is probably more comfortable for long rides but it's hard to tell any difference in rides up to 50 miles. The terrain of the ride, shorts, and saddle choice have much more to do with it.  

I'm eyeing up the Domane 5.2, its at the top of my price range, but you get the Ultegra with a pretty darn good frame. All the other components will eventually get swapped unless you buy a full top-end bike  

Ended up getting a Spec Roubaix Sport Compact. The Domane 4.0 would have been a good Trek alternative but couldn't wait for a February delivery. Really like the Roubaix. View attachment 272789  

Nice bike! I was going to recommend test riding a Cervelo R3. I'm putting my CAAD10 up for sale to fund an 2013 R3 105.  

Thanks. Looked for an R3 to ride but none available in my area. The Roubaix is really comfortable to me.  

Nice, my buddy got a Roubaix with Dura Ace in the summer and he loves it, so many choices and only so much money!  

Your picking your LBS and a Trek Madone, good news. My LBS features Giant so I went with that. You'll never go wrong with your LBS and your gut choice is always right. Enjoy your riding and post a pic for me.  

I am thinking of the Trek Madone 5.2 as my beginner entry level bike but open to other options. From what I have read fit is everything. In the cold I have been training on the trainer. April 2012 was 230 pounds. Now 148 pounds and 5'11". I am 50 and fairly new to Road Bikes. Thanks for letting me read all the comments. Very helpful. Bill  

kg4fxg said: I am thinking of the Trek Madone 5.2 as my beginner entry level bike but open to other options. From what I have read fit is everything . In the cold I have been training on the trainer. April 2012 was 230 pounds. Now 148 pounds and 5'11". I am 50 and fairly new to Road Bikes. Thanks for letting me read all the comments. Very helpful. Bill Click to expand...

• ?            
• 205.3K members

Top Contributors this Month

Is Trek Madone 2.1 Worth Buying? [Trek Madone 2.1 Review]

Table of Contents

Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact

• Price:  $1430
• Category:  Road Bikes
• Frame:  Ultralight 200 Series Alpha Aluminum
• Gear:  2×11
• Tires: 700x23c

What we like  about it :  The advanced alloy frame has a sleek look and handling comparable to carbon fiber bikes.

What we don’t like about it:  Overpriced relative to the component.

Rating :4.6/5

Introduction

Have you heard of the Bugatti Veyron of the bicycle world? Like a fierce beast, swift, fast, hissing on the road, roaring against the wind to the far side of victory, this is our road killer 2015 Trek Madone 2.1 today.

Trek’s top-of-the-line Alpha 200 series aluminum with trek’s proprietary hydraulic technology allows it to maintain a carbon-fiber-like body structure with long-established ergonomic geometry that puts you in a comfortable seating position.

At the same time, the Bontrager R1Hard-Case Lite puncture prevention system creates a sturdy surface with bulge aramid beads that maintain a tight grip even in the face of gravel-spreading flow trails for the ultimate stability.

We have two months of experience measuring the Trek Madone 2.1, and in order to make the results more informative for you, here we will elaborate on the performance, key features, components, and specifications of the Trek Madone 2.1 while riding. 

As well as other versions of the series. If you want to know more about the versions, please refer to our review.

 Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact General Riding

Of course, the most attractive thing to me is still the Trek Madone 2.1 ‘s fascinating and coolest appearance. The 200 Series Alpha aluminum is hydraulically pressed into a specific size tube, achieving the perfect balance between stiffness and weight.

We chose the 7km long country road from Tom’s house, which has eleven sharp turns that test the driver’s driving experience. Of course, the Trek Madone 2.1 didn’t disappoint. The one-piece handlebar and stem, aero seat mast, integrated brakes, and fully internal cable routing made for a clean, tidy ride, and the low stack allowed me to maintain a relatively comfortable seating position even at a standstill.

The alloy Bontrager Race VR-C is also a highlight, with nylon rubber for the comfort of the grip is also a great improvement, I was like holding the horns of a goat, and steadily moving forward.

I was fast, taking only two hours for the entire trip, perhaps because of the Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite tires’ 700x23c surface configuration, which were light but tough enough to keep me moving at a fast pace, even in the face of roadblocks where I couldn’t move forward, and where an older person like me could lift the Trek Madone 2.1.

 Trek Madone 2.1 Gravel Road Ride

As an aero bike, the goal isn’t just endless flat roads, for some cyclists want their ride to be more versatile, and it’s clear that the Trek Madone 2.1 has the capital to do just that.

Our second test was a gravelly park trail with the Trek Madone 2.1 drivetrain The Shimano 105, 11-28, 11 speed was a big help in this, as it was silky smooth to shift from one gear to another.

Of course, there is no denying that bumps on gravel roads can pose a big problem for bikes, and the Trek Madone 2.1 has its own solution.

The Madone KVF carbon version has a higher fork travel, which I thought would have the same soreness as before, but in fact, the fork moved up and down to counteract most of the vibration. The Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite also plays a vital role, as its heavy tire surface clings to the gravel trail to maintain a relatively stable body.

Overall, the Trek Madone 2.1 is certainly qualified as a road bike, and while it may seem outdated now, it was the top road bike seven years ago.

Main Features

Of course, if I need to make a comment on the Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact, it must be its sparse color selection Crystal White Matte Trek Black/Trek White is the choice currently on sale, but if it can add color options its sales will definitely increase.

At the same time, the aluminum body has a lot of options for the previously popular rigid material, after all, it is durable has a relatively strong service life, internal cables are neat and smooth will not cause visual obstruction to you in your travels.

Finally, the Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact has a more comfortable experience term of comfort. This also comes mainly from its exaggerated front-end construction, the two side handles look like the horns of a goat, which can maximize the balance of the body and keep the rider in a comfortable stretch position.

Component and Specifications

Shimano 105 1×11 speed drivetrain.

Personally, I’ve always had high expectations for Shimano, and I was pleasantly surprised by the Shimano 105. It has a relatively light body shape, Mano’s ultra-low friction surface treatment “SIL-TEC” (inner plate) treatment makes it able to dissipate heat faster and will not cause greater obstruction to the road, ultra-narrow HG-X11 directional chain is treated with SHIMANO’s SIL-TEC on the inner plate surface, which can It provides precise gear shifting and higher durability.

But for me personally, I still prefer the 1x system, because it will have a more accurate and easier operation on the speed, after all, I went from the smooth road to the rough grass, and the gear change did take a lot of time.

Alloy Dual-pivot Brake

The alloy dual pivot bicycle brake has excellent braking power, which adds confidence when telling the ride, whether it is a flat road or a muddy country road to maintain a safer and more sensitive braking, excellent braking power, coupled with a soft composite pad.

The forged aluminum arm is held in place by a simple bolt on the hexagonal washer to keep the car body stable. Consists of two brakes, one front, and one rear. This improved braking quality allows you to move more confidently as a rider on those thorny descending paths.

Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite Tires

The Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite is designed to be the cruiser of the road, it is your most loyal companion on the commute, not only does it have high-quality performance, but it even has a relatively low price, you know the maintenance cost of the body is also included in the bike, the Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite is equipped with an anti-puncture system to maintain a long life.

The Bontrager R1 Hard-Case Lite features a 60TPI shell and hard shell Lite puncture protection to reduce weight and increase durability, and low rolling resistance to keep you on the gravel trails of the countryside.

Other Versions of Trek Madone 2.1

In order to give you more possibilities to choose from, we tested other models of Trek Madone 2.1 for a certain period of time, including the 2014 Trek Madone 3.1 WSD Compact, in order to be objective and fair.

Compared to the Trek Madone 2.1, the latter is made of a more advanced carbon fiber material, which means it can maintain a lighter body and higher toughness, not only does the Trek Madone 3.1 WSD Compact have multiple versions of the body construction, not only taking care of the male physiology version, but also the female. The Trek Madone 3.1 WSD Compact may also be an option for you if you have the cash to spare.

Learn More: With Unlimited Energy Like a Goat – Trek Madone 3.1 WSD Review

• What is the price of Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact?

The 2015 Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact is priced at $1430.

• What is the body material of Trek Madone 2.1?

Trek Madone 2.1 body material is 200 series Alfa aluminum.

• What is the tire size of the Trek Madone 2.1?

The Trek Madone 2.1 has a tire size of 700x23c.

Trek Madone 2.1 H2 Compact specs

What do we like about it?

1. High-quality Alfa aluminum frame keeps the body light and smooth.

2. Shimano drivetrain provides greater traction.

3. Bontrager R1 Series tires provide stable travel while maintaining a responsive body.

4. Alloy twin pivot brakes provide excellent braking power.

What we don’t like about it?

1. Relative to the more expensive price of components.

2. Sparse color selection.

Comparison Table

Trek madone 2.1 vs cannondale synapse carbon 4.

Compared to the Trek Madone 2.1, the Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 has a lot of upgrades, first of all in its body frame, which is made of carbon fiber, which means that it can keep the body full of more vitality, and the body is light and can also maintain a relatively good shock absorption.

This means that it can keep the body more dynamic and light while maintaining a relatively good damping effect. Not only that, but the Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 is also up to date with the use of hydraulic discs for the brakes. This means that you can get stronger braking power in the official races.

We also found in real-world testing that both will have the same driving speed (63km/h for both) and you can use them to get a good ranking in an official small road race. If you’re a big fan of carbon fiber, then the Cannondale Synapse Carbon 4 might be your next vehicle of choice.

learn more： Cannondale Synapse Carbon 105 Review – “Aerodynamic Enduro Bike”?

Trek Madone 2.1 vs Canyon Endurace WMN CF SL Disc 7.0

I have to admit that the Canyon Endurace WMN CF SL Disc 7.0 has a definite weight advantage and you can easily lift it up and over obstacles, if you encounter one that is impossible to pass. Not only that, but unlike other endurance vehicles, the Canyon Endurace WMN CF SL Disc 7.0

It has more freedom in the choice of tires, which also means you can make a choice between 650c or 700c size. If you don’t like big and wide tires that hinder your steering, then small tires may be your choice.

Comfort is also the main selling point of the Canyon Endurace WMN CF SL Disc 7.0. The 538mm stack maintains a comfortable static stance without the uncomfortable soreness of the previous one.

The 73.5° seat tube angle also allows you to have a good mass distribution on steep uphill sections. If you are looking for the ultimate comfort in endurance racing, perhaps you should try our Canyon Endurace WMN CF SL Disc 7.0.

Learn more : Is Canyon Endurance 8 Disc Worth Buying? [Canyon Endurance 8 Disc Review]

Trek Madone 2.1 vs Specialized Roubaix Sport

A strong competitor in endurance racing, the Specialized Roubaix Sport

In the body structure and fork composition structure of the choice of FACT 9r carbon fiber material structure, of course, it is not only in the road riding will have a brighter performance, but also in the thorny gravel road is also able to carry out stable riding.

In practice, you’ll find that the Specialized Roubaix Sport has more responsive bodywork than the Trek Madone 2.1 2019, thanks to its slim 700x28c tires and relatively short wheelbase setup, allowing you to take on corners to your heart’s content. If you’re up for the challenge of winding, fast corners, then the 2019 Specialized Roubaix Sport is the right choice for you.

Trek Madone 2.1 vs Specialized Women’s Diverge Sport

As a hardtail, the Specialized Women’s Diverge Sport is an absolute crushing weapon on gravel roads. The FACT 9r carbon fiber body maintains the ultimate stability, keeping the body light while also maintaining a more agile and quicker body.

It is equipped with the ultimate in comfort and aesthetics, giving it an extremely refined appearance. The adapted geometry is in line with women’s physiology, giving them a more comfortable feeling during the ride.

At the same time, it is equipped with 20mm fork travel that can provide you with smooth travel on bumpy roads. The 2x system is still a bit complicated for me, 11 flywheels plus two cranksets will increase the body weight, but perhaps the body will still be a little hindered in its operation, but as an entry-level hardtail model, it may be a good choice.

In case, the above comments are helpful to you, please remember to share the subscription. Have a great day!

Related Posts

[Orbea URRUN 10 20mph Review] – Best Used By People Who Enjoy Riding To Get AFeel For The Mountains!

[schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle review] -is schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle worth buying？.

[Specialized Turbo Como 5.0 Review] – Good Choice?

15 of The Best Mountain Bike Saddles You Can Buy

20 INCH FOLDING BIKE BTWIN 120 Review－Fold up and put in “pocket”

2023 Top 10 Best Fun Kids Bike Bells – Will This Bring Joy To Your Child’s Ride?

27.5 vs 29er Mountain Bikes – The Battle Of The Century

Best 20 inch Bikes For 6-13 Years Old Kids Bikes (With Gears)

Best 27.2 Dropper Post

Best 30.9 Dropper Post In

Best 31.6 Dropper Post

Best Mountain Bike Stems-Better Travel Through The Mountains And Forests

Leave a comment cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Pinkbike.com
• Register New User
• First Looks
• Friday Fails
• Community Blogs
• Fantasy League DH
• Places Directory
• Road Complete Bikes

2013 Trek Madone 2.1

Cool Features