trek 2300 composite 1992

1992 Trek 2300 Composite

Garage find built up with parts from the leftover bin. Eventually the glue holding together the seat tube and bottom bracket lug weakened and the parts were re-used on another frame.

Frame: 1992 Trek 2300 Composite

Fork/Headset: Trek Aluminium

Crankset/Bottom Bracket: Shimano Ultegra 6500

Pedals: Shimano R540

Drivetrain/Cog/Chainring/Chain: Shimano Ultegra 6500

Derailleurs/Shifters: Shimano Ultegra 6500

Handlebars/Stem: 3ttt/Syntace Racelite 2014

Saddle/Seatpost: Shimano Dura Ace 7400/Selle Italia Flite Titanium

Brakes: Shimano Ultegra 6500

Front Wheel/Hub/Tire: Bontrager Race TLR/Clement Strada LGG

Rear Wheel/Hub/Tire: Bontrager Race TLR/Clement Strada LGG

Added over 5 years ago by nikbergerac . Last updated over 5 years ago.

nikbergerac has indicated that they no longer own this bike.

No Comments Yet

2300 , 6500 , aluminium , carbon , road-bike , trek

• View nikbergerac's Profile

nikbergerac's Other Bikes

OutdoorSpree

Trek 2300 Composite (Things You Must Know)

Bicycles are a great way of getting around; not only are they eco-friendly, but they are also easy to maintain, less expensive, and an amazing way to exercise.

Suppose you’re looking into buying one. Though an old bike design, the Trek 2300 is a great choice due to its great specs. Be it for fun, exercise, sports, or as a backup for when your car misbehaves. 

The Trek 2300 is a bike made in 1987 with its frame made of a revolutionary material from the aerospace industry called carbon fibe r.

The carbon fiber is fused with aluminum lugs, rear triangle, rim brakes, and high-end features, making it a valuable vintage bike today. 

Trek 2300 Composite Value

The Trek 2300 was a mid-range bike that sold at $1,200 . Due to their age of production, they’re now considered vintage bikes.

You would get a good deal on eBay or other listing sites for around $200-$600.

Compared to bike frames made of aluminum, frames made of carbon fiber are becoming more expensive.

That is because of the intensity of labor and engineering expertise required to produce carbon fiber. 

A bicycle’s value comes from its material’s worth and how much work went into its production.

Expensive materials and intensive labor would equal more value as workers are paid more. 

Carbon fiber frames are more expensive because, unlike aluminum, they can be mass produced with little or no human interference.

The carbon fiber frame-making process requires more human resources.

Trek 2300 Composite Specs  

Anyone who wants a vehicle would want to know what they’re buying. The Trek 2300 composite comes with some cool specs; check them out below. 

•  Frame: made of a composite of carbon fiber and aluminum. 
• Seat frame angle: 73.5 
• Headframe angle: 73.8
• The forks: made of Bontrager race lite carbon
• Rear shock: not applicable 
• Color: comes in a custom black/red color. You can customize it to your taste. 
• Sizes: 52 cm, 54 cm, 56 cm, 60 cm, and 63cm
• Brake levers: Shimano Ultegra STI dual control 
• The stem and handlebar made: Bontrager Race Lite Carbon 
• Headset: integrated 1 1/8″ Cane Creek IS-2
• Pedals: Not included 
• Front Der: Shimano Ultegra
• Crankset: composed of Shimano Ultegra, 39/53 teeth. 
• Tires: 700 x 23c Bontrager Race X-Lite

Trek 2300 Composite Price  

The price of a new Trek 2300 Composite bike ranges from $1200-$2000 . But, of course, you will not find a new one now because they’ve been out of production for years. 

You can find fairly used or second-hand Trek 2300 composite on eBay and other sites for as low as $300.

Even though they may come with a few defects, you can easily fix them and begin your dream adventure on mountain terrain. 

Being the number one mountain bike manufacturer, Trek® has made a name for itself in the world of bikes due to its quality and constant innovation. 

Below is a list of similar bicycles and their prices from other brands that offer a similar experience and even more than The Trek 2300 composite.

#1. Boardman SLR 8.9 2021

The board man goes for slightly over a grand . Not only is it similar to the Trek, but it also has newer features and an all-carbon-fiber frame. It goes for around $1300.

#2. Ribble R872

Even though the Ribble R872 has the cheapest carbon fiber frame of the Ribble brand, designed to tame the sportive nature of the road. The price starts from around $1100.

#3. Giant TCR Advanced 3 Disc 2021

This bike made by Giant doesn’t only prove its worth on a spec. It also proves it on the road. It was a little more expensive than the preceding ones. It goes for around $2,500.

#4. Canyon Ultimate CF SL 8 2021

Designed to be comfortable for long-distance riders, the ultimate canyon is a great bike for the price. The Canyon Ultimate goes for $2670.

#5. Cannondale SuperSix Evo Disc Ultegra 2021 

With a new aerodynamic, more comfortable, and stiffer frame, the SuperSix Evo has a lot for a bike at its price.

This brand comes with hydraulic brakes and carbon wheels. It goes for about $4,700.

The bikes above have great performance records and are relatively cheap. Suppose you find a Trek 2300 too old for you or hard to come by. These bikes are excellent replacements for it. 

Trek 2300 Composite Review

Reviews are a great way to get insight into what you’re buying. Not only do you know it’ll meet your demands, but you’ll also get first-hand info on performance, looks, and weaknesses. 

The Trek 2300 Composite bike reviews are much. But I’d try to get all the opinions of the people under subheadings on performance, weaknesses, strength, and value rating. 

#1. Overall Rating

The overall rating of the Trek 2300 is amazing . The lowest is four stars. This rating shows how much people enjoyed and loved what they bought. 

#2. Value Rating 

Value ratings tell you if the people who bought it think it was worth the price. The lowest value rating is also four stars, which means people think it’s worth the price it goes for. 

#3. Strength

All reviews pointed to the Trek 2300 composite bike’s strength as fast and quick acceleration; this would excite you if you get that adrenaline rush when riding fast.

They also pointed to it being light; of course, carbon fiber is to reduce weight. They also mentioned it being stiff and comfortable and having super responsive components.

It climbs well and descends stable at high speeds. The brakes and the handlebars are very responsive. 

#4. Weakness

The main complaints were about the frame. Some found it long, others short. However, this depends on how tall you’re. So, ensure to pick a frame that suits your height. 

Another weakness noticed was the paint. Not only was it not attractive enough to some users, but they also complained of it fading away quickly.

You could always go for a paint job if the custom paint doesn’t suit you. If you’re serious about getting faster, you should consider changing some parts.

A customer pointed out that Trek used many Bontrager parts, which he thinks would reduce the vehicle’s speed.

Asides from these complaints , most people found nothing wrong with the Trek 2300.

How Much Does A Trek 2300 Weigh?  

The Trek 2300 weighs 12.57 kg/27.72 lbs. The weight may be slightly more or less depending on the size of the frame you chose. 

Every rider wants to go faster, and weight makes a huge difference in speed . Most bike riders believe lighter equals faster. 

Carbon fiber is stronger and lighter than aluminum. The Trek combines the industry’s most used materials, making it a great pick. 

Conclusion  

Though an old bike, the Trek 2300 composite was revolutionary in its time, and even today, it’s a great choice for riders.

They might be hard to get since Trek stopped producing for quite some time n ow.

• Recent Posts

• Hiking Trails in Ohio: All You Need To Know - December 16, 2023
• Best Hiking Trails in the World and USA! - October 9, 2023
• Hiking Tips for Beginners: Things You Should Know! - October 9, 2023

Similar Posts

Does Cycling Count As Steps On Fitbit Charge 3?

Cycling has been going on for a long time as users purchase bikes to ride just for relaxation, exercise, or competition. It’s awesome to say that cycling is one way to burn calories as it helps in fitness. So, users need to count their steps while cycling for records. Some companies have come to the…

How Can I Tell What Kind of BMX Bike I Have? (Explained)

Various companies manufacture BMX bikes in different models. In addition, various BMX models have specifications that distinguish them from other models. You may be unable to identify your BMX model just by looking at it. So, how can you tell what kind of BMX bike you have? You can identify your BMX using its serial…

How To Tell If My Pedals Are 1/2 Or 9/16?

You may want to know how to identify the size of your bike pedals. Bike pedals come in different sizes, which are 1/2 and 9/16. Both pedals consist of 20 threads per inch, so it may be difficult to tell what size your pedals are. Asides from the number of threads per inch they both…

Can I Convert Rim Brakes To Disc Brakes? (Explained)

Many bike owners often opt for brake conversion when the brakes of their bikes become defective or begin to malfunction. Changing your bike’s brakes involves removing some vital components and replacing them with new ones from another bike. In some cases, this conversion can be quite difficult to achieve. On that note, can I convert…

Bike Seat Won’t Go Lower (Reasons & Solutions)

You may be confused as to why your perfect bike seat would refuse to go lower. What if you just got a new bike or brought out your old one from the store room, and the seat is too high for you. You’d want to lower it to make yourself more comfortable riding it.  Your…

Research Paper Writers

Writing a research paper is a long and hard job and research paper authors are usually those who have long experience within the business of academia. They have tried to create their profession Author Recent Posts Josh Matthews Born in the 80’s and raised on the plains at the foot of the Colorado mountains. I…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek 2300 Road Bike

Frame Material: aluminum, carbon seat stays Frame Angles: 73.8 head, 73.5 seat Sizes: 50cm, 52cm, 54cm, 56cm, 58cm, 60cm, 63cm Colors: Black/Red Fork: Bontrager Race Lite Carbon Rear Shock: Not applicable Brake Levers: Shimano Ultegra STI Dual Control Handlebar: Bontrager Race Lite Stem: Bontrager Race Lite Headset: 1 1/8" integrated Cane Creek IS-2 integrated Front Der: Shimano Ultegra Crankset: Shimano Ultegra, 39/53 teeth Rear Der: Shimano Ultegra SS Pedals: Not included Tires: 700 x 23c Bontrager Race X-Lite

• USER REVIEWS

Bike is fast. Smooth shifts. Comfortable seat. Comfortable handlebar position, nice retro styling. Easy to pedal. Great commuter bicycle. Fremont Elite Concrete Pumping

Front fork could be a little more robust. Tires puncture easily by thorns.

Light weight, great components - Ultegra and Bontrager. Climbs really well and it's very comfortable.

I changed the Shimano Ultegra chain for a SRAM PC991 which is far quicker and more accurate.

I changed from the excellent Trek 1000 around 1 year ago. The ZR9000 Aulminium frame is much lighter and stiffer than the Trek 1000. Whilst the Trek 1000 is a great starter ride the 2300 feels a much more complete ride. At 5'8" I ride a 54cm frame which I find very comfortable - I have tried a 56cm frame but I found the reach too long and it gave me back ache.

Similar Products Used:

Trek 1000, Trek 120 Carbon.

Tough bike and components. I am a clydesdale at 210 pounds and the bike has held up to 4000 miles of near daily riding with only a few issues. Still rides like new. Drivetrain has missed only one shift in 4000 miles.

I did pull most of the spokes through the rear tire rim (Bontrager Race Lite) at about 3000 miles. LBS/Trek replaced the wheel with a new one no questions asked. You have to like Trek and their warranty support.

Was a leftover at the LBS so I got an fantastic deal on it. Bike is a significant upgrade for me so I am still amazed at how smooth and quiet that the ride is - except for a bit of harshness on chip seal roads. The bike flies up hills and I am usually able to swamp my riding buddies on long climbs.

Old dinosaur Schwinn Traveler.

The bike is fine - the carbon seat stays in addition to fork give it a softer ride, I think, than a 2003 2300 I have which only had carbon forks. And the workmanship seems good and Ultegra parts are 'of course' great. Just one 'warning' - my 58 cm seems a bit 'front heavy,' although proper preparation for turns during descents has helped me avoid a mistake just after getting the bike that I couldn't get out of (helmet saved the day, though). I had a brainstorm and looked at Trek's website eh voila - the 2007 2100, which is the 'new' 2300 I think, has about a 2 cm longer head tube than the 2007 all-carbon road frames, and also has a tad bit more relaxed (i.e. less racing) geometry overall. So perhaps the head tube, which indeed looks very long and is much longer than on a 56 Trek 5500 I have, is contributing to a slight difference in feel. So, maybe, if you want something a bit more nimble, go for the all-carbon Treks. But it's a nice bike overall.

Trek knows how to make a great road bike. The geometry is spot on, and the setup is right where it needs to be for a bike placed right under the carbon brothers. Very stiff and well suited for a larger rider.

Trek has a tendency to over-bontrager all of their bikes. They are good parts, but if you are serious about riding fast some parts of this bike will need to change. Also the B-B flex is more notable than the carbon bikes.

At 6'5", 210 it was important to have a full 63cm. After riding for some time, I started to learn how important it was to have the full snappy aluminum frame. The bike snaps up the hills and through the sprints. The OCLV rear end is nice when the ride gets long, and has a nice comfortable feel. The full 6500 Ultegra is nice, but dated at this point. The Geometry is right on the money, it is quick when it needs to be, but quite stable at speed. I added a Deda Newton stem and bar and that added some much needed stiffness to the front of the bike.

Trek 5200 Bianchi San Lorenzo

light,strong and comfortable in first season I bought this bike I won all the road races.tyres has perfect grip but not durable

paint has no quality,

before I bought this bike I rode a Raleigh 501 reynolds(1980). When I saw and test 2300 it's definitly effect me. I rode it about 8000miles and there is only one problem about it (from the begining) DA FC7700 is very long(180mm) and it's very elastic. Each time I attack or get up for climbing chain is contact with FD it doesn't change even if you have best tune. But Rest of the bike is perfect...best value for money!

I got this bike at the start of last racing season. (didn't want to lay down my colnago c50) Great bike very responsive. I picked the bike up on a Sat. raced it on Sun. no problems. It did take few min. to got used to the shorter top tube but a couple of sit adjustments and the bike was perfect

Light Stiff Comfortable All Ultegra Components

Could be a little bit lighter but overall very good

I have owned this bike for about 2 months now and have about 2000 miles on it. I will tell you that this is a great bike especially at the price i paid for a leftover '05. It is fairly light, is very stiff, but still gives a compliant ride. Even on rough rodes it seems butter smooth. Its a good component set and is very comfortable for those long rides.

good stock parts, light, stiff, and most importantly for me, not a bike I would cry over if I totalled it in a crash :)

Isn't quite as light or stiff as I would want, but that's just me. The stock fork is super heavy, as are the wheels. I dropped about a pound upgrading those. It's great overall.

I bought this bike directly through Trek at an insanely low sponsorship price. obviously at that price it was amazing. I'm glad I purchased it when I did, because now I'm seeing Trek is starting to cut corners on their part specs. As others have said, not the most eye-catching or exotic frame out there, but it's light, stiff (it better be b/c I'm a sprinter), and the paint job is really nice. However, the geometry is not great for someone w/ long arms/upper body because it has a shorter than average top tube.

1st Road bike: 80's Raleigh Grand Prix. Didn't know what I had till the seat stay snapped :(

Comfort Durability Quick accelerator Nice climber Very stable high speed descender. (I haven't gone above 40mph yet.) Ultegra Group continues to work perfectly. Shifts right everytime. Have yet to throw the chain in 2400 miles. Brakes, excellent. Excellent value overall. Dura-Ace on this bike would be overkill. Do not under estimate this bike.

None significant enough to remark upon. Actually I have zero complaints.

Wow!!! (How's that for a synopsis?) This is an update to my review below written 15 mos. and 2,400 miles ago when the bike was new. This bike is sweet! It performs flawlessly in every way. Except for tire-to-road noise the bike is silent in motion. I'm 5'9.5" It fits like a glove. Comfort is great. Most distance in saddle at a stretch, 40 miles on the Selle San Marco Era Lux saddle that came on the bike; no problem. I've added Bontrager carbon fiber (CF) clincher rims w/CF flangless hubs. Woohoo! They've held up very well. Overall combo is a smooth, well handling, quiet, riding experience. The nice thing about this bike is I'll never stress its limits. Since my previous review I've increased my exercise circuit to 20-25 miles and am averaging over 3 mph faster. Oh, I've lost 20 lbs too!

See previous write up dated Aug 2nd 2004 below.

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• Register New User
• First Looks
• Friday Fails
• Community Blogs
• Fantasy League DH
• Places Directory
• Road Complete Bikes

Trek 2300 Composite

Cool Features

Sprague & Sons Bicycles

We fix things. Mostly bikes. Also home improvement. Teaching the boys the ancient art of "do it right".

Trek 2300 Composite

When I was a young 20-something, I wanted one of these.  This model is the first carbon bike that I personally ever saw in the early to mid 1990’s.  I’m not too excited about this one, as I’m too tall to enjoy it, but man is it light!

I just finished it today.  After all the polishing of its aluminum stays and lugs, I’m happiest about the cork rain plug that I made for the stem.  I’ve seen corks used as bar end plugs, so I figured I’d use a cork in this application.  Maybe I can carve out a niche for myself as a stem corker.

Share this:

Leave a comment cancel reply.

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classifieds

Retro 1991 Trek 2300 Composite carbon/aluminum

• Add to quote

Retro 1991 Trek 2300 Composite carbon/aluminum This has been my racing bike since 1991, I rode it in over 50 century rides before competing in National and California Championships, and at least 30 Criterium races since 1991. I have upgraded the fork with a competition Wound Up stiff carbon fiber fork. I upgraded the cranks with Dura Ace and have maintained the bike for racing for all those years. This bike is race bred and one of the first to have carbon fiber main tubes on the top, seat, and down tubes. the main tubes are all connected via aluminum fittings for the head set, seat post clamp, chain stays, and seat stays. Light Aluminum Alloy racing handle bars, FSA setback seat post, Mavic SUP racing wheels, Continental Attack/Force racing tires. 18 speed Asking Price: $600.00 Condition: Good Frame Size: 56 cm Country: United States  

• ?            
• 15.5M posts
• 520.4K members

Top Contributors this Month

Brochures | Price Lists and Values | Trek History | Trek Timeline | Serial Numbers Component Dates | Gallery | Contact | Buy/Sell Suggestions Refurbish/Upgrade | Bike Resources | Home

*Trek is a trademark of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, WI

All copyrights in the TREK brochures, pricelists, owner's manuals and photographs displayed on this website are the sole property of Trek Bicycle Corporation, Waterloo, Wisconsin.

All materials in this site not copyrighted by others are Copyright © 2001-2015 Skip Echert Web Associates , All rights reserved.

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classic Forums
• Bikes, Frames and Forks

Old Trek 2300 w/Carbon Tubes?

• Add to quote

I'm looking at picking up a late '80s early '90s Trek 2300 with carbon tubes. Condition looks good, but I was just wondering if anyone had any thoughts about it or if there was anything I should beware of?  

rpiontek said: I'm looking at picking up a late '80s early '90s Trek 2300 with carbon tubes. Condition looks good, but I was just wondering if anyone had any thoughts about it or if there was anything I should beware of? Click to expand...

I have one Haven't used it on the road for a couple of years but it is still going strong on the trainer. There is some corrosion at the carbon/aluminum joints but it still works. Probaly some 15000 road miles on it before I got another bike. If it looks good and it fits go for it - one of the early ventures in carbon bikes.  

Great frames. Bonded carbon bikes got a bad rap because of some early european frames, particularly the Vitus / Peugeot frames. Companies that had been doing bonded aluminum frames simply substituted carbon tubes for aluminum, without changing glues, or accounting for the fact that you now had dissimilar materials being joined. The frames failed at the joints with grim regularity. Unfortunately, the technique got the bad rap, not just those particular frames. Trek, on the other hand, did it right. I worked at a shop that used to be a Trek dealer. We still honored their free tune-up policy, and I saw a lot of bonded Treks, both Al and CF. I've never seen or heard of a joint failure in a bonded Trek frame. Our senior wrench had worked there since 1987, he'd never heard of it either. Also, Trek's current carbon frames are glued. Carbon tubes to carbon lugs. They don't fail either. If you've ever flown in an airplane, you've trusted your life to mixed-material bonded joints. It can be done right. Trek does it right. The old 2300 frames are not light by modern standards, at around 3.5 pounds for the bare frame. But they ride nice, handle well, are super strong, and deserve to be ridden. About the only thing wrong with them is the early-90s paint jobs. And no, they're not noodly. Frame stiffness doesn't matter anyway, but even if it did, the 2300 is stiff enough --Shannon. --Shannon  

I agree w/ shannon - if you can get one cheap - ride it, it'll be fine  

Trek 2300/2100 I have a 91 model Trek 2100, a 105 equipped machine with the same frame as the 2300. The bike has over 25,000 miles on it, rides great, and well, I love it! I see no end to its useful life anytime soon. Its not my primary ride anymore, but it still gets plenty of use. SPIKE  

I have owned a TREK 2300 composite frame for 15 years and it is still a good ride.....I use it now mainly as a back up bike. That bike has to have atleast 50,000 miles on it and still climbs and cruises just fine.........  

I had a 1993 model - it was my first real road bike, equipped with Shimano 600 (which eventually became Ultegra), but was stolen after just 2 years. I loved the bike but bought something else to replace it because the carbon/aluminum bonds had started to 'creak'. I don't know if this translated to any loss of performance or structural integrity, but it swayed me (at the time) towards monocoque carbon construction. Take it for a test spin if you can - if it doesn't creak it should be fine. I still see a couple of guys around here riding them.  

I have seen a couple that the bonding has come undone at the lug and they were given warrenty without question. Check the lugs. Other than that a buddy uses a 2150, the same frame, as a winter commuter in Chicago and it is still going strong.  

I have one that a friend basically gave me, not sure of the year, full Dura-Ace with down tube shifters, trying to decide if I should try and get it rideable or just go ahead and get new bike, Chip could come back and ask for it back, would hate to dump money in it and then loose it..  

I've got a 2200; same frame with 105 parts plus some upgrades. Yes, it was noodly until I replaced the al fork with CF with less rake. It's my commuter/backup now. Great bike.  

I had the Halloween model, (orange and yellow graphics) as my first "real" road bike. I put 10000 miles on it, sold it cheap to a friend's son who rides the snot out of it as a cross trainer from his college cross country team. Great beginner bike.  

About the only negative thing that i have heard about them is the chance of corrosion at the lug/tube area. There is a specific name for it, I think it is Galvanic corrosion, but if the frame is clean, buy it and ride it. I knew a guy who had an old Speciliazed Epic that was a lugged aluminum/carbon frame from the early 90s and he rode the h#ll out of that frame before finally replacing it this summer. This frame obviously could take the punishment as this guy was probably 6'2" and at least 220.  

The Carlster said: I agree w/ shannon - if you can get one cheap - ride it, it'll be fine Click to expand...

had a 1995 2100 with the same blue/nude paint job as demonstrated by dmar836. Very nice looking bike in person. There was also a gorgeous green and red of the same vintage. Some of the earlier ones were indeed hideous. Mine came apart at the bb/seat tube lug after about 4 years. Don't remember what sort of mileage. I'd have to say that if you find one that's already been well-used, at this point it's probably not going to come apart. I'd get it cheap and accept the small risk. Shannon has been exposed to far more Treks than I have, but I know 2 other people who also had lugs come apart on theirs - both were somewhere on the seatpost lug. So, maybe this was a freak occurance, but there's at least some truth to the Trek bonded frames being a problem at some point during production. The bonded frames were no longer being produced when mine broke, and I was pretty adamant about not winding up with an aluminum replacement (they weren't that great at the time), so Trek gave me an OCLV with no argument. Can't complain about that! The frame itself had a very nice ride. Handling was balanced and neutral. I prefer much more nervous frames, even for stage racing and general riding, but the Trek seemed like a nice compromise for doing pretty much anything. But, I disagree with what Shannon said about stiffness (other than the fact that it isn't necessarily faster). Part of the reason for the nice ride was the frame was a noodle and the aluminum fork was a pogo stick. If you want a similar frame that is stiffer and much more nervous, a Specialized Epic of same vintage would be another option. Of course it is heavier and rougher riding. Both are nice, strong frames if the bonding is done correctly. I've been riding a Specialized Epic as grocery hauler/rain/roubaix/questionable crit course/time trial bike for 5 years now and the thing has been indestructable.  

If the bike fits you and the price is right, go for it. I've got a 1992 model w/ Shimano 105. it's my secondary bike now, but it's still in great shape. mine weighs 23 lbs as shown. never felt any noodly feeling. I've enjoyed the bike as my primary for 15 years. lost track of how many miles it's got - thousands for sure. note to DMAR836...if you're skipping out of gear, it could be a wear and tear issue and you need a new rear cassette and chain. when I would really bear down, my chain would slip into another gear. once I put on a new cassette and chain it cleared it up. :thumbsup:  

I got mine for free. I rode it for a 2 years stock with upgraded wheels. I raced it a few times and I get a newer bike. My Shimano 600 shifters had worn out so I bought a ENO hub and turned her into a fixed gear. She gets ridden every day. I bought a carbon fork too, the performance brand works great. No problems at all. I don;t know how old it is though. Dark grey and carbon.  

I have a 1994 2200, the only year Trek had the balls to sell a Campy bike. No issues in the frame at all. Comfortable, fast and climbs well and descends like a demon. I purchased a 2100 from a friend last year just because I love the frame and if you do not want the 2300 I'd take it. BTW, I met someone who's 1994 2200 had a a bad joint and she exchanged it for a Madone frame free of charge. The bike still looks new despite countless miles. Saddly I purchased a Lemond Versailles this month to replace the 2200 as top bike in my fleet.  

jhibb said: How much is being asked for it? I own one and could maybe give a better deal. I could email you pictures of it. Click to expand...

Early carbon frames with aluminum lugs supposedly had an issue with coming apart at the lugs, but I have owned a 2200 in the past and know many others who still ride them from the Trek 2100 and Giant 980c to the old school Specialized Allez (not to be confused with the newer Allez that are aluminum). None of them ever had any problems and the bikes ride nicely.  

botto said: by most accounts it's a 'noodly' ride, and i'd personally be a bit concerned about whether the bonding of the tubes to lugs still worked. IMO it's a collectors item, not a bike to be taken out on the road. Click to expand...

• ?            
• 206K members

Top Contributors this Month

• Search forums

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

• Road For Sale - Complete Bikes

Trek 2300 Composite (Year 1993) Road Bike (54cm)

• Thread starter mtbchris
• Start date Nov 7, 2014

Retro Newbie

• Nov 7, 2014

I have a Trek 2300 Composite Road Bike for sale (1993). This was my first road bike and I am reluctantly selling to create some space in my garage. The bike frame is made of aluminium/carbon (Easton Unidirectional Carbon Fibre) in the original colours of Ice Blue and Graphite. The frame size is 54cm. The group set is Shimano 600. Original 'Matrix' wheels are fitted along with a aluminium alloy fork and 'Velo' titainium saddle. The bike is in Very Good Condition with only some small signs of wear. £249  

Attachments

• Nov 11, 2014

Re: Hi there, where are you based? kerry  

• Nov 14, 2014

Re: Trek 2300 Composite (Year 1993) Road Bike (56cm) Hi Kerry, I am based in Sandgate, near Folkestone in Kent (CT20 3BQ) UK. Thanks Chris  

Re: Ouch, Couldn't get much further away. Nice bike, good luck with sale. Kerry  

• Nov 17, 2014

Re: Trek 2300 Composite (Year 1993) Road Bike (56cm) Hi Kerry, One of the guys I work with lives in Lincoln, so I could get the bike to you if you want it? Chris  

Similar threads

• Jul 2, 2023

• dainesefreak
• Jan 26, 2024
• Jun 11, 2023
• Retro Classic Road
• Sep 6, 2023
• Sep 27, 2023

Latest posts

• Latest: wynne
• 5 minutes ago
• Latest: finbar
• 9 minutes ago

• Latest: Gilco
• 13 minutes ago

• Latest: BOBU
• 34 minutes ago

• Latest: non-fixie
• 39 minutes ago

Submit Search

• Utility/Hybrid
• Kids/Junior
• Bicycle Czar collection
• Electric Assist

Back to top

Weight Weenies

Skip to content

• Active topics
• Board index General Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.

1992? Trek 2300 update 25/01/2013 7.57 kg down from 8.88kg

Moderators: MrCurrieinahurry , maxim809 , Moderator Team

Post by bm0p700f » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:56 pm --> by bm0p700f on Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:56 pm

by » Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:56 pm --> by Weenie on Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:56 pm

Post by HugoDrax » Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:58 am --> by HugoDrax on Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:58 am

Post by bm0p700f » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:59 am --> by bm0p700f on Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:59 am

Post by 2002maniac » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:32 pm --> by 2002maniac on Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:32 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:17 pm --> by bm0p700f on Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:17 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:32 pm --> by bm0p700f on Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:32 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:01 pm --> by bm0p700f on Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:01 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:55 pm --> by bm0p700f on Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:55 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:36 pm --> by bm0p700f on Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:36 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:13 pm --> by bm0p700f on Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:13 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:28 pm --> by bm0p700f on Mon Nov 26, 2012 7:28 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:11 pm --> by bm0p700f on Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:11 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:33 pm --> by bm0p700f on Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:33 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 pm --> by bm0p700f on Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 pm

by » Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 pm --> by Weenie on Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:28 pm

Post by bm0p700f » Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:36 pm --> by bm0p700f on Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:36 pm

Return to “Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.”

• ↳   Weight Weenies
• ↳   Introduce Yourself / Gallery - Please use metric weights.
• ↳   Catch all // Gallery threads
• ↳   MTB
• ↳   Road
• ↳   Wheelsets & Tires (Road)
• ↳   Bike Travel, Cycling Tourism, Destinations & Events
• ↳   Find a Ride / Meetups
• ↳   Cycling Kits
• ↳   Watt Weenies Forum
• ↳   CX & Gravel
• ↳   Randonneurring, Bikepacking, Commuting, E-Bikes
• ↳   Training
• ↳   Cycle Chat
• Marketplace
• ↳   For sale - Pictures are mandatory 22-3-13
• ↳   Wanted
• ↳   Hero or Villain
• ↳   Comments
• Board index
• All times are UTC

Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Limited

Privacy | Terms

Latest blog postings

Popular blog postings.

• Advertising

• Скидки дня
• Справка и помощь
• Адрес доставки Идет загрузка... Ошибка: повторите попытку ОК
• Продажи
• Список отслеживания Развернуть список отслеживаемых товаров Идет загрузка... Войдите в систему , чтобы просмотреть свои сведения о пользователе
• Краткий обзор
• Недавно просмотренные
• Ставки/предложения
• Список отслеживания
• История покупок
• Купить опять
• Объявления о товарах
• Сохраненные запросы поиска
• Сохраненные продавцы
• Сообщения
• Развернуть корзину Идет загрузка... Произошла ошибка. Чтобы узнать подробнее, посмотрите корзину.

3 Bed 2 Bath 1992 Marlette 4325 LENVILLE RD LOT 49 , Moscow , ID 83843

Off market  , mobile home details.

• Rooms: 3 bed(s), 2 bath(s)
• Dimension: 28 ft x 48 ft
• Home Area: 1,344 sqft
• Model: 1992 MARLETTE
• Listing ID: 15652
• 21st Mortgage ID: 180878
• Posted On: Aug 21, 2010
• Updated On: Nov 18, 2017

Description

This is a repossessed property owned by 21st Mortgage. General disclaimer - The information presented is believed to be accurate at the time of posting; however, there may be some inaccurate or out of date material listed. The information listed, including make, model, size, year of manufacture, availability, floor plan, features, acreage, price and other information, are all subject to change without notice. Please contact the 21st Mortgage Remarketing Center at 866-727-4817 before making any purchasing arrangements. The products represented on this website are to be sold on an "as is" basis, except for purchases completed within a state that has certain state law requirements for such purchases. 21st Mortgage expressly disclaims any and all warranties, expressed or implied, including without limitation, warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, with respect to any products. Texas Retail Business License # RB35098

• Heating : E

View more Mobile Homes for Sale in Moscow, ID

Similar Mobile Homes for Sale